CNN is promoting an upcoming Sanjay Gupta special on "Happiness and Your Health" with a teaser article that made me think of the Wesley Smith column about growing support for euthanizing disabled newborns that Rob brought to our attention recently.
Smith discussed, among other things, NYT columnist Jim Holt's suggestion that " the decision to kill ill or disabled babies should be governed by “a new moral duty,” namely, “the duty prevent suffering, especially futile suffering.” Holt writes: "To keep alive an infant whose short life expectancy will be dominated by pain — pain that it can neither bear nor comprehend — is, it might be argued, to do that infant a continuous injury."
I think that experience with abortion decisions based on prenatal diagnosese of disabilities clearly shows that Smith is right in observing that "The concept of suffering is not limited to pain, but must also take account of “quality of life,” as more liberal advocates of infanticide would surely point out." Which brings me to the CNN article on happiness. Although it's light and frothy, it references some serious research that's been done on how people actually living with disabilities are just about as happy as the general population. Why are these kinds of findings persistently ignored by people trying to justify euthanasia or abortions based on disabilities?
Lisa