Mirror of Justice

A blog dedicated to the development of Catholic legal theory.
Affiliated with the Program on Church, State & Society at Notre Dame Law School.

Tuesday, June 24, 2008

Save D.C. Catholic schools!

It looks like the House has decided to let the D.C. voucher program survive another year; however, "Congressional Democrats seem ready to eliminate the $14.8 million program entirely in 2009. 'This year’s bill is essentially a placeholder in this debate,' said Rep. José E. Serrano, a New York Democrat who chairs the appropriations subcommittee on financial services. 'I expect that during the next year the District leaders will come forward with a firm plan for either rolling back the program, or providing some alternative options.'"

More:

Hopes are high that the attrition of schools from the D.C. parochial system has ended — but that will require Congressional action in the very near future. “I’d be very surprised if Democrats in Congress turn their backs on the inner-city poor in D.C.,” Father Nuzzi observes, “given the impact the program has made.”

But it’s a very real possibility. While the D.C. voucher program has earned the support of local leaders like Mayor Adrian Fenty and former mayors Anthony Williams and Marion Barry (now a member of the city council), Congressional Democrats remain opposed to the program. If they vote to eliminate vouchers next year, more inner-city Catholic schools may have to close their doors, regardless of archdiocesan efforts to keep them open.

Says the Fordham Foundation’s Petrilli: “Losing vouchers would be a hit for Catholic schools. And it would be bad news for everyone.”

This presents a great opportunity, it seems to me, for a "change" Democrat, who is friendly to faith and reform, to break ranks with tired anti-choice ideologies.  Anyone?

Monday, June 23, 2008

St. Thomas More and the Constitution

Some interesting, and timely, thoughts, from the Vox Nova blog, on St. Thomas More and the judicial role.  Check it out.

Robert Rodes on Same-Sex Marriage

Congratuations to my colleague, Prof. Robert Rodes, whose essay, "On Marriage and Metaphysics", has been named the "Best Scholarly Essay" by the Catholic Press Association.  More here.  And, here is a link to the paper.

Enhancement Biotechnology and the Natural Law

At the First Things blog, Ryan Anderson and Christopher Tollefsen have posted reflections about a natural-law approach to enhancement-biology questions.  It will definitely be of interest to MOJ readers.  A taste:

What might a natural-law appraisal of biotechnological enhancement look like? Much of modern ethics, especially when applied to biotechnology, springs from emaciated views of human nature. In response, a sound natural-law approach would need to begin with a twofold account of the nature of the human person.

The first part would be descriptive: Human persons must be shown to be human animals—bodily organisms of the species Homo sapiens. And the second part would be normative: Human persons must be shown to be fulfilled by certain ends and harmed by others. Both animality and rationality shape and define the constitutive aspects of our well-being, and critical reflection can identify the various goods that truly perfect us. . . .

Thoughts?

"The Catholic Thing"

A new (to me, anyway) blog, which might be of interest.

"The Greening of Planned Parenthood"

It's a common phenomenon, the marketing of everyday products as "green" (even when it is not entirely clear the product is environmentally friendly).  Now, Planned Parenthood is getting in on the act, as Kathryn Lopez describes:

Don't look now, but as the business Planned Parenthood is in (unrestricted abortion) becomes less popular, the abortion leader aims to distract. Cover will be provided by the Church of the Green: In Massachusetts, plans are for a “green” clinic, made of recycled and other environmentally friendly materials.

Dianne Luby, president of the Bay State branch tells the Wall Street Journal: “we’re trying to reposition ourselves as caring about their health, about prevention, about a sustainable planet.” She wants the abortion provider to be “much more mainstream.” . . .

. . .  Planned Parenthood is a booming business. The Journal article this morning reports that PP took in $1 billion in its last financial report. According to the piece, about a third of that revenue comes from federal and state grants for low-income women. “The nonprofit ended the year with a surplus of $115 million, or about 11% of its revenue, and net assets of $952 million.”

Why is Planned Parenthood receiving federal funds, you ask? Excellent question. Planned Parenthood received some $305.3 million in government funds in the 2005-06 fiscal year.

"Selective respect" for the Church?

In the New York Times Magazine, discussing anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant views in Europe, my friend Noah Feldman writes, in "The New Pariahs?":

Certainly it is reasonable for free societies to encourage immigrants to adopt their own liberal values. A Dutch requirement that potential immigrants view a film depicting topless bathers and gay couples may seem a little childish, but it is not a human rights violation, and it may even help prepare immigrants for the different world they are poised to enter. Schools should teach the values of the surrounding society, including respect for different lifestyles. Nevertheless, a hallmark of liberal, secular societies is supposed to be respect for different cultures, including traditional, religious cultures — even intolerant ones. There is something discomfiting about a selective respect that extends to the Roman Catholic Church, with its rejection of homosexuality and women priests, but excludes Islam for its sexism and homophobia.

I'm not sure how much "respect" the Church gets in Europe these days, but let's put that aside.  Let's put aside also the question whether the Church's "rejection" of women priests is usefully compared to (what appear to be) the practices and views with respect to women and their role in society of traditionalist Muslims.  It seems a mistake to overlook the fact that "Islam" is, for some Europeans, a matter of concern not simply because of its "sexism and homophobia", but because of (what seems to be) these Europeans' concerns about religiously motivated violence.  To be sure, it could be the case that some Eurpeans (and Americans) are unfairly attributing to all or most Muslims the bad acts and unsound views of a few.  Still, I think there's more going on here than just a prejudiced lack of comfort with newcomers.

Sunday, June 22, 2008

Celebrating some saints!

June 22 is the feast day of both St. John Fisher and St. Thomas More, both of whom are, I expect, admired by, and inspiring to, many MOJ readers -- not only for the obvious reason (More and lawyers), but because of their courageous stands for the freedom of the Church as against the overreaches of the "state".

Don't forget, though, June 23, which is the feast day for, inter alia, St. Thomas Garnet, an English Jesuit who was martyred 400 years ago this year, after being tortured by officials seeking information about his uncle, Fr. Henry Garnet, S.J.  Garnet was told his life would be spared if he took the Oath of Allegiance, but he refused.  He was executed at Tyburn, insisting that he was "the happiest man this day alive."  (As it happens, June 23 is also the birthday of my son, Thomas Garnett.  And, as it happens, St. Thomas Garnet's father -- Richard Garnet, Henry's brother -- was expelled from Balliol college, thus ending his hope for an academic career, after a statue of the Blessed Mother was found in his rooms.)

Continue reading

God is great

I don't really have a Catholic Legal Theory hook for this, but I cannot help it.  My uncharacteristic (but, perhaps, welcome?) blogging silence during the past few days is a result of a just-concluded trip to Arizona with my son.  It's quite something, watching a 7-year-old's face when he sees the Grand Canyon for the first time:

Monday, June 16, 2008

Eduardo's "Land Virtues"

For what it's worth, I wanted to offer an enthusiastic "second" to the suggestion that MOJ readers take a look at Eduardo's recent paper, "Land Virtues", which I was (finally) able to read closely.  It's first-rate -- careful, thoughtful, timely, interesting.  Congratulations to Eduardo.