Mirror of Justice

A blog dedicated to the development of Catholic legal theory.
Affiliated with the Program on Church, State & Society at Notre Dame Law School.

Tuesday, January 10, 2006

"Justice Talking"

A few days ago, on the NPR program "Justice Talking," Prof. Marci Hamilton and I discussed the whole "Christmas and Religion in the Public Square" thing.  (Click on the link, and then scroll down to "recent programs" if you are interested in listening).

Rick

The Wheaton kerfuffle

I appreciate the posts by Rob, Mark, and Tom about the firing of Joshua Hochschild, a philosophy professor at Wheaton and a convert to Roman Catholicism (and a Notre Dame graduate).  My immediate reaction to the news was that the firing will likely increase the number (which, I gather, is significant) of engaged Wheaton students and graduates who explore, and join, the Catholic Church (or Orthodoxy). 

Also, like Tom, I was a bit confused by Hochschild's statement that "[t]he Bible ... is indeed the supreme authority for Catholics, who turn to the Church hierarchy only as Protestants consult their ministers."  I'm not a theologian, but I suspect that this statement is wrong.  In Dei verbum, for example, we're told that "Sacred Tradition and Sacred Scripture make up a single sacred deposit of the Word of God."  (Catechism, No. 97).  And, "[t]he task of giving authentic interpretation of the Word of God, whether in its written form or in the form of Tradition, has been entrusted to the living, teaching office of the Church alone."  (Catechism, No. 85).

On the question of Wheaton's religious distinctiveness and mission, I think Rob puts it well:

Shielding themselves from intellectual or spiritual pollution through unhelpful and outdated categorical Catholic-Protestant distinctions compromises Wheaton's mission.  But railing against religious discrimination in general does not facilitate a productive conversation on this issue, for I fully support institutions that take religious identity seriously.  A more prudent course is continued evangelical-Catholic engagement in an effort to show that for a school devoted to shaping followers of Christ in an academically rigorous environment, Joshua Hochschild is an asset, not a threat.

Now, just as I think the Supreme Court should not be in the business of telling the Boy Scouts what it really stands for, I suppose it's not my place to tell Wheaton what it's identity and mission really are.  Still, we do all love Jesus, so . . . it strikes me that Rob is right.

We have not talked much about this statement, in the Wall Street Journal piece:

But now a conservative reaction is setting in, part of a broader push against the secularization of American society. Fearful of forsaking their spiritual and educational moorings, colleges are increasingly "hiring for mission," as the catch phrase goes, even at the cost of eliminating more academically qualified candidates.

I cringed here, because, at Notre Dame, the myth that "hiring non-Catholics" is how we "hire for excellence," or that by hiring Catholics we sacrifice excellence, still has purchase in some quarters.  In fact -- as Brad Gregory (a great scholar) points out in the piece -- the opposite is true:

Administrators say that instead of reducing quality, Notre Dame's religious identity has lured some premier faculty, such as associate professor Brad Gregory, who left a tenured job at Stanford in 2003 for an equivalent, higher-paying position. "Notre Dame's Catholic character wasn't only a factor, it was the factor," says Mr. Gregory, a Catholic, who specializes in the history of Christianity. "By any ordinary measure, you'd be crazy to leave Stanford for Notre Dame."

Rick

Well said

A few days ago, Joseph Loconte wrote an op-ed, commenting on "current Democratic tactics designed to reclaim religious voters," in which he discussed, e.g., the writing and arguments of Jim Wallis.  Professor Althouse had this to say:

Do religious ideas undermine democratic discourse? Some would say that all religion should be purged from political debate, but that excludes or burdens a lot of people whose natural way of thinking and speaking combines religion with ideas about the good.

The problems really arise when speakers in the political debate start citing texts that some people hold sacred and others don't. The polical discourse goes awry if they use these texts as dictates that must be followed, not because they make intrinsic sense, but because they come from God. How is someone who disagrees supposed to argue? The text is not sacred? Well, they could argue for a different interpretation of the text. But do people who believe in a religious text want to hear a nonbeliever reshape its meaning? And does the nonbeliever want to have to deal with that text? It's not the most fruitful way to have a discussion about politics, but I don't think it should be delegitimated as undemocratic. I think it's more undemocratic to try to constrain the speech of the many people who think in terms of religion.

Monday, January 9, 2006

A Dominican perspective

Below is the Christmas letter Father Chysostom McVey, OP, Promoter General of the Dominican Family and Assistant to the Master General of the Order for the Apostolic Life, sent this year.  It seems worth sharing.

Dear Family and Friends,           January 2006

It has, I know, been quite a year for just about everybody: natural disasters (the earthquake toll in Pakistan alone is now 83,000, with survivors facing a cruel winter in the mountains, making the elderly and infants especially vulnerable) and man-made ones with tens of thousands of victims of an ideology, or racial and religious hatred, and random violence. ‘Where there are victims,’ as the Jesuit, Jon Sobrino, reminded a group of us Dominicans in El Salvador in December, ‘there are also victimizers.’ Several times during Advent, verses from Isaiah’s vision (Is 11.1-11) of a ‘peaceable kingdom’ reappear, with wolf and lamb living together, lions eating grass, being led by a child; babies crawl among poisonous snakes and a little child puts its hand in the hole of a vipers’ nest and remains unharmed. While there are animals and children in Isaiah’s vision, there is no mention of ‘man.’ Perhaps the peaceable kingdom is only possible if we become like children. They belong there; we older ‘victimizers’ do not. Where does responsibility lie? And what are we becoming? What is becoming of our world – hardly a ‘peaceable kingdom?’

Someone, in a recent article said he did not want u-topia, ‘no place,’ but eu-topia, ‘another place and a good place.’ I thought that particularly apt. Not utopia, ‘no place,’ which is nowhere, and can never be, but eutopia, ‘a good place,’ which can and must be everywhere. This is the kind of ‘good place’ Christians long for and work for: ‘What we hope for is what he promised: a new heaven and a new earth, where justice is at home’ (2 Pt 3.13). Along with Emily Dickenson’s poem about hope being ‘the thing with feathers that perches in the soul and sings the tune without the words and never stops at all,’ I discovered a new favorite from Thérèse of Lisieux, who said, ‘My personal folly is hoping.’ So is mine.

In Madrid last year, I picked up a book of Goya’a etchings. He was old and deaf in 1824 and he portrayed himself as an old man with long white hair and beard, stooped, and walking with two canes, yet above the drawing he had written, Aun aprendo, ‘I am still learning.’ It is above my desk now as I write. I think I identify with Goya because I am getting close to his age – and I am still learning – even from eight- and ten-year-old great nieces, who told me, ‘It’s better to be a girl because girls can do anything!’ I thought of sending that message to the gang on the other side of the Tiber but my hoping is not yet that outrageous.

My hoping has been strengthened this past year. By brothers and sisters who minister in Albania to a people still bruised from years of Communism; by brothers, sisters and laity in Vietnam who labor creatively under severe restrictions – and where one old Dominican told me, ‘Thank God for the Communists because they have kept us poor and faithful.’ Outside Saigon, the Order has several hospices for AIDS victims. We visited one for young men, ten in all, dying from AIDS related diseases. We prayed, sang, and then the doctor – who had earlier told me, ‘We die easily in Vietnam’ – asked them to share their hopes. They had not, most of them, lived a ‘good’ life, and one of them hoped ‘to live a little longer, to serve, to be able to say I’m sorry.’ As you can imagine, this year tears have lubricated my hoping. Somehow this seems the only proper response (although I am working on outrage too). I pray this year will bring us all closer to that ‘eutopia’ promised us and for which, deep down, we all yearn.

Chrys McVey (Tom)

Wheaton's Narrowness

As a convert to Catholicism with a sister who is a Wheaton College grad and a mom who is a Wheaton College prof, I've been troubled by the Joshua Hochschild story since the news broke a while back.  The WSJ article tries to situate Hochschild's firing within the broader higher ed trend of schools recapturing their Christian identities.  It's an awkward fit, for two reasons. 

First, Wheaton College is not recapturing anything; a convert to Catholicism would have been fired from the faculty twenty years ago, fifty years ago, or one hundred years ago.  This is a case of the institution trying to enforce previously unquestioned boundaries on its engagement with other faith traditions.  (And yes, Catholicism would be viewed as another faith tradition.)

Second and more significantly, Hochschild's firing has nothing to do with a school like Notre Dame trying to hire more Catholics.  Notre Dame wants to maintain a critical mass of Catholics in order to ensure a distinctively Catholic identity.  Wheaton wants to exclude any non-evangelicals in order to ensure an exclusively evangelical identity.  For higher education, that's a key difference.

My discomfort with Wheaton's stance is exacerbated by the fact that we're not talking about the Amish seeking to maintain a fortress mentality against the outside world.  Wheaton College is no inward-looking bunch of folks -- in fact, the school prides itself on its prominent academic ranking and achievements.  Shielding themselves from intellectual or spiritual pollution through unhelpful and outdated categorical Catholic-Protestant distinctions compromises Wheaton's mission.  But railing against religious discrimination in general does not facilitate a productive conversation on this issue, for I fully support institutions that take religious identity seriously.  A more prudent course is continued evangelical-Catholic engagement in an effort to show that for a school devoted to shaping followers of Christ in an academically rigorous environment, Joshua Hochschild is an asset, not a threat.

Rob 

UPDATE: Open Book has an extensive conversation going about the WSJ article.  From the comments, here's an interesting perspective from a Wheaton grad / Catholic convert on why a path beginning in Wheaton often leads to Rome:

I am another whose journey to Rome began as a student at Wheaton (BA '79, MA '85) Why so many of us? Wheaton's emphasis on integration of faith and learning is really very Catholic in its understanding of reason and revelation. Catholic schools could learn from them how to implement the perspective of Fides et Ratio across the curriculum. Also, there was a strong emphasis on history -- I was required to take both the history of philosophy and theology (one year of each) as an undergraduate religion major. My encounter with the Church fathers in historical theology planted the seed that would eventually lead me to Rome. There was an emphasis on serving the "Christ and his kingdom" in both evangelistic and social outreach that is quite consonant with Catholic teaching. The way I was taught to do historical critical study of scripture from the perspective of faith is quite consistent with Dei Verbum and other Catholic magisterial teaching (I encourage my Catholic seminary students to read Evangelical biblical scholarship). The pervasive attention to Lewis, Tolkien and others at Wheaton formed my imagination in sacramental directions. A popular slogan at Wheaton was "all truth is God's truth" and the goal of Christian higher education was presented as the integration of all truth into a coherent Christian worldview. By this concern for fullness of truth centered in Christ, Wheaton invariably starts many (I'm not sure how many) on a road leading to that fullness of truth found within the Roman Catholic Church.

So if they're really worried about the school losing its evangelical identity, instead of firing the Catholic, maybe Wheaton would be better advised to stop teaching Aquinas . . .

Evangelicals and Catholics Apart, at Wheaton

Thanks for Mark for posting the evocative story about Joshua Hochschild, who was fired from the Wheaton College (IL) philosophy department after he converted to Catholicism.  It appears that Prof. Hochschild took a step of conscience and has suffered for it -- not greatly compared with a lot of  people around the world, but suffered nonetheless.  Just a few quick reactions.

First, Wheaton unquestionably has the legal right to restrict hiring to evangelical Protestants, just as a Catholic college (if it wanted to) would have the right to restrict hiring to Catholics.  CLARIFICATION: So what I'm saying is that this is an issue of theology and judgment, not law.

Second, I was struck by Prof. Hochschild's argument to Wheaton's president (as stated by the WSJ) that "[t]he Bible ... is indeed the supreme authority for Catholics, who turn to the Church hierarchy only as Protestants consult their ministers."  Let me ask a question back: what is the reaction of others to this statement (whic admittedly may not reflect Hochschild's argument perfectly)?

Third, I imagine things like this happening less and less over time as evangelical Protestants more and more make common cause with traditionalist Catholics on cultural and theological issues -- and more and more conclude that many Catholics have a "personal relationship with God through Christ" even if that relationship is more fully constituted by and mediated through membership in the institutional Church.  (Note the professor who called for the school to "draw on evangelicals within the major Christian traditions -- Catholic, Orthodox, and Protestant.")  As evangelical Protesants develop their sense of Christian history (often through conversations with Catholics in the common-cause efforts mentioned above), they will more and more see Aquinas and other Catholic thinkers as significant figures in their tradition too, and they will want or accept the faculty most equipped to teach those thinkers -- who are likely to be disproportionately Catholic.

Fourth, and on the other hand, as time goes on there may be more evangelical scholars deeply grounded in and appreciative of the Catholic intellectual tradition, and that may reduce the perceived need that the article refers to at the end to hire Catholics to teach things like medieval philosophy.

Tom

"Scholarship or Distraction"

One of the worth-attending programs at this year's AALS program, sponsored by the Section on Scholarship, was called "Blogging:  Scholarship or Distraction?"  The panelists included Larry Solum of "Legal Theory" and Randy Barnett of "The Corner."  The audience was chock-full of bloggers (including our own Mark Sargent), and the conversation was very interesting.  For comments by other profs, see these by Dan Markel, Dan Solove, Paul Caron, Larry Ribstein, Ann Althouse, and Christine Hurt.  Recommended reading!

No Catholics at Wheaton?

From today's Wall st Journal. I will offer some thoughts on this after I have had a chance to think about it, but I wanted to make sure everyone saw this. Comments from our Evangelical friends welcome.

January 7, 2006 Wall Street Journal

www.djreprints.com

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB113659805227040466.htm

A Test of Faith

A professor's firing after his conversion

highlights a new orthodoxy at religious colleges.

By DANIEL GOLDEN

January 7, 2006; Page A1

WHEATON, Ill. -- Wheaton College was delighted to have assistant professor Joshua Hochschild teach students about medieval philosopher Thomas Aquinas, one of Roman Catholicism's foremost thinkers.

But when the popular teacher converted to Catholicism, the prestigious evangelical college reacted differently. It fired him.

Wheaton, like many evangelical colleges, requires full-time faculty members to be Protestants and sign a statement of belief in "biblical doctrine that is consonant with evangelical Christianity." In a letter notifying Mr. Hochschild of the college's decision, Wheaton's president said his "personal desire" to retain "a gifted brother in Christ" was outweighed by his duty to employ "faculty who embody the institution's evangelical Protestant convictions."

Mr. Hochschild, 33 years old, who was considered by his department a shoo-in for tenure, says he's still willing to sign the Wheaton faith statement. He left last spring, taking a 10% pay cut and roiling his family life, to move to a less-renowned Catholic college.

Mr. Hochschild's dismissal captures tensions coursing through many of America's religious colleges. At these institutions, which are mostly Protestant or Catholic, decisions about hiring and retaining faculty members are coming into conflict with a resurgence of religious identity.

Joshua Hochschild

Historically, religious colleges mainly picked faculty of their own faith. In the last third of the 20th century, however, as enrollments soared and higher education boomed, many Catholic colleges enhanced their prestige by broadening their hiring, choosing professors on the basis of teaching and research. As animosities between Catholics and Protestants thawed, some evangelical Protestant colleges began hiring faculty from other Christian faiths.

But now a conservative reaction is setting in, part of a broader push against the secularization of American society. Fearful of forsaking their spiritual and educational moorings, colleges are increasingly "hiring for mission," as the catch phrase goes, even at the cost of eliminating more academically qualified candidates.

Addressing faculty at the University of Notre Dame, the school's new president, the Rev. John Jenkins, recently expressed concern that the percentage of faculty who were Catholic had fallen to 53%, compared with 85% in the 1970s. Today's level is barely above a line set in 1990 by the late Pope John Paul II, who decreed that non-Catholics shouldn't be a majority of the faculty at a Catholic university.

Notre Dame is compiling a database of candidates who can contribute to the university's religious mission. Administrators say that instead of reducing quality, Notre Dame's religious identity has lured some premier faculty, such as associate professor Brad Gregory, who left a tenured job at Stanford in 2003 for an equivalent, higher-paying position. "Notre Dame's Catholic character wasn't only a factor, it was the factor," says Mr. Gregory, a Catholic, who specializes in the history of Christianity. "By any ordinary measure, you'd be crazy to leave Stanford for Notre Dame."

At another Catholic school, Boston College, some administrators would like to hire more people committed to its religious mission, but its faculty has proved "particularly resistant," says a 2004 report by the Association of Jesuit Colleges and Universities. To achieve its goals, the college is contemplating establishing research centers on Catholic intellectual tradition and Catholic education. Georgetown University, also a prominent Catholic school, appointed its first vice president for mission and ministry, a Jesuit priest, in 2003.

About 400 U.S. colleges cite religion as an element in their hiring policies. And many of these colleges, such as Brigham Young, an almost entirely Mormon university, are growing fast. At the 102 evangelical Protestant schools belonging to the Council for Christian Colleges and Universities, full-time faculty rose 36.2% from 1991 to 2003, the latest available data. These schools hire only Christians, mostly Protestants.

Defining evangelical schools isn't easy to do, but in general they are populated by people of various Protestant faiths who share a common religious vision. That includes a commitment to spreading the word of God and a literal interpretation of the Bible.

Many, like Wheaton, bar Catholic and Eastern Orthodox faculty. "We've got a marvelous Greek Orthodox person we'd kill to hire and we can't," says Wheaton sociologist James Mathisen. Mr. Mathisen says he has mixed feelings about the Protestants-only policy. He understands the religious rationale but also feels it deprives Wheaton of quality faculty.

Such hiring policies would be illegal at most universities but the 1964 Civil Rights Act carves out an exemption for religious colleges. Their students qualify for federal financial aid. Partly because of their hiring practices, evangelical Protestant colleges have been denied certain kinds of aid in California and Colorado under laws barring support of "pervasively sectarian" schools.

Phi Beta Kappa, the honors society, hasn't established a chapter at any of the evangelical colleges that make up the Council for Christian Colleges and Universities, including Wheaton. Kelly Gerald, a spokeswoman, says the society wants to uphold what it sees as the values inherent in the liberal arts and sciences, such as tolerance for diverse points of view. The American Economics Association, which operates a Web site for academic job seekers, deletes references to religious preferences in job listings.

Injecting faith into hiring decisions often runs counter to decades of tradition -- even at religious schools -- and as a result has sparked fierce debate. Robert Sloan stepped down last year from his position as president of Baylor, a Baptist university in Waco, Texas. He alienated some faculty by questioning job candidates about how they would infuse religion into teaching and research, and vetoing some who didn't answer satisfactorily.

Mr. Sloan, now the school's chancellor, says the unhappiness was "one of the central factors" in the "turmoil" that led to his resignation. John M. Lilley, the new president, won't interview faculty candidates, says Baylor Provost Randall O'Brien, a high-ranking administrator.

Baylor hires only Christians and Jews. According to Mr. Sloan, Jews were included because a prominent Jewish scholar was on the faculty at the time the policy was formulated. Mr. Sloan says the school gives hiring preference to Baptists first, followed by other Protestant evangelicals, then other Protestants, other Christians, and lastly Jews.

Wheaton College, founded in 1860, is ranked the 55th top liberal arts college by U.S. News and World Report. It has an endowment of $294 million. On the 1600-point SAT scale the average combined verbal and math score of entering freshmen is 1336, similar to the average scores at University of Virginia and Bryn Mawr.

Wheaton has a handful of Catholic students, houses papers of Catholic authors such as J.R.R. Tolkien and welcomes Catholic visiting professors. But it has never hired a Catholic professor full time and tells Catholic applicants it won't consider them for such posts.

Wheaton College President Duane Litfin

In 1993, Wheaton's English department did venture outside Protestant circles, bringing in visiting professor Thomas Howard, whose conversion to Catholicism had cost him a job at an evangelical school in Massachusetts. That same year, Wheaton hired a minister from an evangelical church in Tennessee, Duane Litfin, as its president. One of Mr. Litfin's early acts was to prevent Mr. Howard from giving a speech in the college chapel. Mr. Litfin says his decision was in line with college rules.

Since then, Mr. Litfin has mostly stuck to tradition. An exception in 2003 was easing Wheaton's ban on faculty drinking, which was considered a disadvantage in recruiting.

In a 2004 book titled "Conceiving the Christian College," Mr. Litfin argued that hiring Catholics would start Wheaton down a slippery slope. Wouldn't having Catholic faculty, he asked rhetorically, "lead to a gradual sacrificing of Wheaton's distinctives?"

In an interview, Mr. Litfin acknowledges that a ban on Catholic faculty "narrows the pool that you can draw from." But he says that the school's niche is also a key to its success. "If you look at the caliber of our faculty, this is an amazing place. It's thriving. Why do genetic engineering on it? Why muck up its DNA?"

As president, Mr. Litfin was forced to tackle that question, which came unexpectedly from a young professor traveling a roundabout spiritual journey.

Joshua Hochschild grew up in Plainfield, Vt. His father, who died when Joshua was 9, was Jewish; his mother came from a Lutheran family. Neither was observant. Josh edited the student newspaper and was valedictorian at his public high school before enrolling at Yale.

There, for the first time, he made friends who took religion seriously. Studying philosophy, he came to believe that many important philosophical questions ultimately lead back to religious ones. Evangelized by an Episcopalian friend, he converted as a sophomore and was later baptized. Of Protestant denominations, Episcopalianism is closest in doctrine, liturgy and hierarchy to Catholicism.

Mr. Hochschild's brother Adam, a St. Louis lawyer, says he was appalled by his brother's religious turn at the time. "I just thought he had been lost to the dark side," he jokingly recalls. Eventually, Adam also became a Catholic -- on the same day as his brother.

Mr. Hochschild pursued his philosophy studies in graduate school at Notre Dame. "I had friends who thought, 'You're going to Notre Dame, you'll convert,' " recalls Mr. Hochschild, who says he gave the matter little thought. His Ph.D. dissertation analyzed the 15th-century writings of a Vatican cardinal, who was later sent to urge Martin Luther, the founding father of Protestantism, to recant.

When he got his doctorate, Mr. Hochschild was offered jobs by Wheaton and a Catholic school -- Mount St. Mary's University in Emmitsburg, Md. Says Carol Hinds, a former Mount St. Mary's provost: "He was a Protestant, but he was a faithful person. He could contribute to the mission." Feeling "in between" the two schools' spiritual traditions, Mr. Hochschild chose Wheaton.

He signed Wheaton's faith statement, which asserts that the Bible is "inerrant," meaning without error, and "of supreme and final authority." Wheaton President Mr. Litfin asked in a job interview how Mr. Hochschild understood that passage, according to their later correspondence. Mr. Hochschild said he agreed, but added that the Bible should be read in light of "authoritative traditions," an example of which would be church councils. Although that view is closer to Catholicism than evangelical Protestantism, the president approved the appointment.

Mr. Hochschild got on well with colleagues and students, and University of Notre Dame Press agreed to publish his revised dissertation. "He was excellent on every score," says Wheaton's philosophy department chairman, Robert O'Connor.

Joshua Hochschild had to leave his assistant professorship at Wheaton College, an evangelical Christian college located in Illinois, after he converted to Catholicism.

Yet a question nagged Mr. Hochschild: Why am I not a Catholic? As he saw it, evangelical Protestantism was vaguely defined and had a weak scholarly tradition, which sharpened his admiration for Catholicism's self-assurance and intellectual history. "I even had students who asked me why I wasn't Catholic," he says. "I didn't have a decent answer."

His wife, Paige, said her husband's distaste for the "evangelical suspicion of philosophy" at the school might have contributed to his ultimate conversion. The Hochschilds say some evangelicals worry that learning about philosophy undermines students' religious convictions.

During a 2003 academic conference at Notre Dame, Mr. Hochschild revealed his anguish to another attendee, a priest. The priest replied that Mr. Hochschild seemed, in his heart, to have already embraced Catholicism. Although he had taken Communion in the Episcopalian church, Mr. Hochschild realized after the conversation that he longed to "obey the Gospel commands to eat the flesh of Christ [as a Catholic]." Returning home, he signed up for a Catholic initiation class.

Aware of Wheaton's Protestants-only policy, Mr. Hochschild recalls thinking he would probably lose his job. In September 2003, he told the philosophy chairman, Mr. O'Connor, of his intention to convert. Hoping Mr. Hochschild could stay, Mr. O'Connor notified the administration.

In general, Catholics believe the Pope is the final authority on religious matters. Protestants reject that authority and generally profess a direct relationship between the individual and the Almighty.

A months-long debate followed between President Litfin and Mr. Hochschild. They argued over whether the professor could subscribe to Wheaton's faith statement, which faculty must reaffirm annually. Like most evangelical colleges, Wheaton bases its employment practices on such a document.

Wheaton's 12-point statement doesn't explicitly exclude Catholics. But its emphasis on Scripture as the "supreme and final authority" and its aligning of Wheaton with "evangelical Christianity" were unmistakably Protestant, Mr. Litfin wrote to Mr. Hochschild in late 2003. Because Catholics regard the Bible and the pope as equally authoritative, a Catholic "cannot faithfully affirm" the Wheaton statement, he continued.

Mr. Hochschild disagreed. The Bible, he wrote, is indeed the supreme authority for Catholics, who turn to the Church hierarchy only as Protestants consult their ministers. While acknowledging the college's right to exclude Catholics -- and knowing his position was endangered -- he replied that as a matter of principle, "I see no reason why I should be dismissed from the College upon joining the Roman Catholic Church."

Mr. Hochschild was "quibbling," the president retorted four days later. "Perhaps Wheaton College has come to a point where, because of challenges such as yours, it must revise its documents to make more explicit its non-Catholic identity."

Mr. Litfin said the college would terminate Mr. Hochschild's employment at the end of the 2003-2004 school year. He later agreed to let Mr. Hochschild stay another year to find a job. On the eve of Easter 2004, Mr. Hochschild was received into the Catholic church.

President Litfin's office is across the street from the Billy Graham Center, named for the famed preacher and Wheaton alumnus who has sought to reconcile Protestants and Catholics. The president says he has also been "a part of this rapprochement." But, he maintains, the core doctrinal issues separating Protestants and Catholics "have by no means gone away."

The president wouldn't discuss the specifics of Mr. Hochschild's case, which he calls a personnel matter. He did say, "Josh is a terrific young guy. We would have loved to keep him."

The decision disappointed some at the college. Describing his ex-colleague's conversion as "a real act of intellectual and spiritual courage," philosophy professor W. Jay Wood says Wheaton could enhance its quality by "expanding the extent to which it draws on evangelicals within the major Christian traditions -- Catholic, Orthodox and Protestant." Indeed, not all evangelical schools are so strict. Messiah College, in Grantham, Pa., counts a dozen Catholics among 170 faculty.

Josh Carlton, a 2004 Wheaton graduate, says Mr. Hochschild excelled at guiding discussion. "I'm thinking about graduate school, and I don't know if I would be doing that if I hadn't had him," says the philosophy major, who complained to trustees about the dismissal. Mr. Litfin says the majority of faculty, students and alumni support the Protestant-only hiring policy.

At home, Mr. Hochschild encountered doubts within his family. His wife, a Canadian native, remains Episcopalian. "I hoped she would convert to Catholicism," Mr. Hochschild says. "I tried for a while to press it, but that's not the kind of thing you can force."

Mrs. Hochschild, who recently finished her dissertation in theology at the United Kingdom's Durham University, says she sometimes wishes her husband would have "waited for the rest of the family to be on board." But, she says, she trusts his reasoning and convictions. The Hochschilds are raising their three children, ages 11 months to 5 years, as Catholics.

His brother Adam says Mr. Hochschild "knew he was supposed to be doing what he was doing" and was calm about the decision, even though he was his family's sole breadwinner.

In what was at best a lateral move, Mr. Hochschild accepted a lower-paying assistant professorship at Mount St. Mary's, the college he once spurned. Mr. Hochschild applied to both secular and Catholic colleges, but only the latter invited him for interviews.

Mount St. Mary's has a lower average freshman SAT score -- 1094 -- than Wheaton and a much smaller endowment of $33 million. The transition delayed his opportunity for tenure by two years, increased his teaching load and uprooted the Hochschilds from their home in an affluent Chicago suburb. They now live in a smaller, rented house on the Maryland-Pennsylvania border.

On Sundays, the family worships at a Catholic church, St. Anthony's Shrine, though Mrs. Hochschild sometimes slips out early to an Episcopal one. Mr. Hochschild wishes the service, which features modern hymns, was more traditional.

For Mount St. Mary's, Mr. Hochschild's newfound Catholicism was a bonus because the school was just starting to reassert its own religious mission. The Rev. J. Wilfrid Parent, the school's executive director for Catholic identity, says he will be involved in hiring new faculty, asking candidates about their faith and tracking the proportion of Catholics.

Meanwhile, Wheaton hasn't replaced Mr. Hochschild. One obstacle: Most scholars of medieval philosophy are Catholics.

URL for this article:

Sunday, January 8, 2006

The Imagination and Life of C.S. Lewis

I received for Christmas, and quickly finished reading, The Narnian: The Life and Imagination of C.S. Lewis, by Wheaton College (IL) English professor Alan Jacobs.  The subtitle is accurate, and the second part of it the subtitle is the key to why it's a fascinating, occasionally stirring book.  Jacobs foregoes a simple chronological biography and spends a lot of time on the themes in Lewis's writing.  He argues that the Narnia stories are not just what Lewis is most widely known for.  The fantasy stories are the key to understanding the whole range of his writing -- apologetics, literary criticism, moral critiques -- because for Lewis it was the "enchanting power of stories" that most fully revealed, if still only partially, the truth about good and evil, human purpose, God and the "joy" that is the object of our almost unutterable longings.

The book closes on this idea with a frequently-quoted passage from "The Weight of Glory," Lewis's 1941 sermon at the University Church in Oxford.  Although it's about literature and music -- and I think that law is different from those -- it also calls up some associations with the enterprise of law as a partial reflection of the ultimate law and the ultimate ends of human beings.  Jacobs calls the passage "the whole of what Narnia represents" and adds that "[i]f this thought has a future, then so does Narnia, and so does the body of C.S. Lewis's writing":

The books or the music in which we thought the beauty was located will betray us if we trust to them; it was not in them, it only came through them, and what came through them was longing. These things - the beauty, the memory of our own past - are good images of what we really desire; but if they are mistaken for the thing itself they turn into dumb idols, breaking the hearts of their worshippers. For they are not the thing itself; they are only the scent of a flower we have not found, the echo of a tune we have not heard, news from a country we have never yet visited.

Tom

Friday, January 6, 2006

Bishops Conferences exposed

Readers of MofJ may be interested in David Yamane's fine new book,  The Catholic Church in State Politics: Negotiating Prophetic Demands & Political Realities. 

New York

:  Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2005.  $24.95.

A review of the book, which I prepared for American Catholic Studies, follows:

Until the early twentieth century, the Catholic bishops in the

United States

expressed their collegiality through occasional councils and meetings.  In 1917 the bishops for the first time came together in the formal organization that eventually mutated into today’s United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, whose efforts and accomplishments at the national level are widely known and variously judged.  The Catholic Church in State Politics demonstrates that the national level is today only the more visible of the collegial functioning of the bishops in the

U.S.

  David Yamane has provided a much-needed and fascinating study of the emergence and operation since the 1960s of Catholic conferences at the state level.  Thirty-five such conferences are in operation today; in 2002 the average conference budget exceeded $400,000.

The book begins with a history of the conferences; it then explicates the internal structures of the conferences; next it studies the strengths of the conferences and assesses the challenges they face in making Catholic perspectives heard in state law-making.  As Yamane makes plain, the principal function of these conferences is not to teach Catholics; it is to influence public policy and law state by state.  In the concluding chapters, Yamane analyzes the conferences’ place within the overall life of the Church in the modern, secularized world.  The book is a cautious celebration of the state conferences’ efforts to help see a “seamless garment of life” ethic be given legal effect. 

The book is well-written, thoroughly documented, and, in its consideration of questions of ecclesiology and of liberal political theory, both insightful and provocative.  There can be no doubt but that David Yamane has done a great service by providing a rich empirical account of the work of the Church at the level of state politics.  Readers will vary in their assessment of the appropriateness of the work Yamane describes and admires, but this is a book to be read by anyone with an interest in how the Catholic Church in the

United States

clothes the public square at the state level, where many of the hot-button issues arise and receive resolution that is frequently final.  Yamane’s use of the work of such scholars as Richard John Neuhaus, Michael Perry, Steven Smith, and Paul Weithman, on the place of religion in the American public square, is deft and apt.    

Of particular future interest is the fact that, as Yamane demonstrates, the typical conference is headed by a board whose voting members are the bishops of the state; the trend over the last quarter-century has been away from lay membership on the boards. Under the direction of its board, each conference employs the services of lay people trained or experienced in legislative practice, law, or other disciplines.  Their practical expertise has led to influence that unassisted successors to the apostles could not reasonably hope for.  Yamane stresses that the conferences’ work carries the “authority” of the (local) Church in virtue of their largely episcopal-governed boards.  Writing in 2004, Yamane was optimistic about the future of the conferences; he also noted (157) the reservations of then-Cardinal Ratzinger to institutional interpositions between local bishops and the Church universal.