Friday, January 6, 2006
Bishops Conferences exposed
Readers of MofJ may be interested in David Yamane's fine new book, The Catholic Church in State Politics: Negotiating Prophetic Demands & Political Realities. New York
A review of the book, which I prepared for American Catholic Studies, follows:
Until the early twentieth century, the Catholic bishops in the United States U.S.
The book begins with a history of the conferences; it then explicates the internal structures of the conferences; next it studies the strengths of the conferences and assesses the challenges they face in making Catholic perspectives heard in state law-making. As Yamane makes plain, the principal function of these conferences is not to teach Catholics; it is to influence public policy and law state by state. In the concluding chapters, Yamane analyzes the conferences’ place within the overall life of the Church in the modern, secularized world. The book is a cautious celebration of the state conferences’ efforts to help see a “seamless garment of life” ethic be given legal effect.
The book is well-written, thoroughly documented, and, in its consideration of questions of ecclesiology and of liberal political theory, both insightful and provocative. There can be no doubt but that David Yamane has done a great service by providing a rich empirical account of the work of the Church at the level of state politics. Readers will vary in their assessment of the appropriateness of the work Yamane describes and admires, but this is a book to be read by anyone with an interest in how the Catholic Church in the United States
Of particular future interest is the fact that, as Yamane demonstrates, the typical conference is headed by a board whose voting members are the bishops of the state; the trend over the last quarter-century has been away from lay membership on the boards. Under the direction of its board, each conference employs the services of lay people trained or experienced in legislative practice, law, or other disciplines. Their practical expertise has led to influence that unassisted successors to the apostles could not reasonably hope for. Yamane stresses that the conferences’ work carries the “authority” of the (local) Church in virtue of their largely episcopal-governed boards. Writing in 2004, Yamane was optimistic about the future of the conferences; he also noted (157) the reservations of then-Cardinal Ratzinger to institutional interpositions between local bishops and the Church universal.
https://mirrorofjustice.blogs.com/mirrorofjustice/2006/01/bishops_confere.html