I consider myself to be a pro-life feminist, but I have a confession: I am not a fan of Sarah Palin. She might be a wonderful woman with a powerful life story, but her candidacy embodies a sort of anti-intellectual populism that is deeply troubling to me. I probably would not have voted for McCain in any event, but his selection of Palin solidified my opposition. Let me try to explain without resorting to the anti-Palin hysteria I see from the professional pundits.
I was drawn to the Catholic Church, in part, because the Church does not fear the world. Growing up in evangelical churches, I often had the sense that Christians were supposed to hunker down, circle the wagons, and ride things out until the Second Coming. Science, secular universities, and even the arts were to be viewed warily as potential threats to one's faith and to a God-centered culture. (As my brother says, "If evangelicals believe that God will protect our kids in the most dangerous third world mission fields, why do we doubt that God can protect our kids at Harvard?") I always had the sense that we were playing defense, and not the sort of aggressive defense that seeks to win, but the sort of defense that consists of covering your head and bracing for impact. The Catholic Church, by contrast, was so secure in the Truth of God's sovereignty that it stood ready to engage the world on the merits. Seek and celebrate knowledge.
When I listen to Sarah Palin and witness the rapturous embrace she has received from the GOP base, I'm taken back to my evangelical upbringing. It is as though she revels in her lack of knowledge, wearing it as a badge that says "I'm one of you, not one of them." It doesn't even matter, in the end, whether humans lived with dinosaurs, whether global warming is caused by humans, whether she knows any Supreme Court rulings, et cetera. The point, for many of her followers, is that she does not allow factual inquiry to trump worldview. Indeed, a major component of the operative worldview is to be extremely wary of factual inquiry. Nuance is not welcomed -- e.g., when the presidential candidates were asked about evil, Obama was heavily criticized for giving a long answer that includes the need for self-critical reflection, while McCain was celebrated for a two-word response: "Defeat it." In a changing and uncertain world, our reflexive defense is epistemic certainty, no matter the facts. It was that way in my church growing up, and it's that way in much of our political discourse now.
This is not a liberal-conservative problem, though the two most obvious recent embodiments of this have been leading figures in the GOP (Palin and George W. Bush). Conservative figures such as Pat Buchanan and Newt Gingrich, to offer two counterexamples, do not fear factual inquiry and ideas. They welcome intellectual debates and knowledge. I may disagree with many of their ideas, but I affirm their willingness to join the debate.
A more sinister ramification of a disdain for factual inquiry is that it lends itself to dehumanizing those who do not share our worldview. Intellectual engagement and an openness to new ideas is one key way in which we build bridges to "the other." When our worldview is a closed set, it becomes easier to marginalize. We can see some hints of this now in the campaign, with Palin, for example, using "East Coast" as a pejorative and saying that Obama "is not a man who sees America the way you see America and the way I see America." (This is not just a conservative problem, of course, as a competing worldview that has closed itself to intellectual engagement would not even recognize Trig Palin's humanity.)
So when Palin ignores the debate moderator's questions and instead speaks "straight to the American people" with a combination of winks, shout-outs to "Joe Six Pack," inartful colloquialisms, and empty slogans, should it trouble us, as Catholics called to engage this world? You betcha.
Monday, October 6, 2008
Big news from the University of San Diego:
Michael Perry, one of the nation’s foremost authorities on international human rights law and theory, has been appointed to a three-year term at the University of San Diego as University Distinguished Visiting Professor in Law and Peace Studies. Perry is the first faculty member to have a joint appointment in the law and peace schools at USD.
It will be great to have our own Michael P. teaching at a Catholic law school. (HT: Leiter).
This event might be of interest to South Bend-area readers:
Title: “Catholic Voters and the 2008 Presidential Election”
In particular, we have asked the participants to address the question: “For an otherwise pro-life voter, what constitutes a sufficient 'proportionate' reason to justify a vote for a pro-abortion candidate?”
Participants:
Gerard Bradley, Notre Dame Professor of Law & member of the Catholics for McCain National Steering Committee
Vincent Rougeau, Notre Dame Associate Professor of Law & member of the steering committee for Obama’s Catholic National Advisory Council
Moderator: John T. McGreevy, Dean of the College of Arts & Letters
Date: Wednesday, October 8th
Time: 6:30pm (reception to follow)
Place: McKenna Hall Auditorium
Sponsored by the Notre Dame Center for Ethics & Culture, and funded by the Notre Dame Fund to Protect Human Life.
Sunday, October 5, 2008
Benedict XVI Launches Bible-Reading Marathon
Calls It "Fitting Accompaniment" to Scripture Synod
VATICAN CITY, OCT. 5, 2008 (Zenit.org).- Benedict XVI kicked off a Bible-reading marathon on Italian television, which he called a "fitting accompaniment" to the world Synod of Bishops on the Word of God.
The Pope read from Genesis on "Bibbia Giorno e Notte" (Bible Day and Night), a program broadcast by RAI where the Bible will be read from beginning to end in various languages by nearly 1,200 readers.
The Pontiff's secretary of state, Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, will conclude the marathon Saturday, reading the last chapter of Revelation.
Readers will include, among others, participants in the 12th Ordinary General Assembly of the Synod of Bishops on "The Word of God in the Life and Mission of the Church," which the Holy Father inaugurated today. The synod will end Oct. 26.
The site of the reading will be the Basilica of Santa Croce in Gerusaleme in Rome. Organizers received 180,000 requests to participate in the event.
Benedict XVI spoke about the event after reciting the Angelus with thousands of pilgrims gathered in St. Peter’s Square in the Vatican today. He said, “This event is a fitting accompaniment to the Synod of Bishops on the Word of God.
“The Word of God can thus enter into homes to accompany the lives of families and single persons: a seed that, if properly welcomed, will not fail to bear abundant fruit."
The two days of the "Conference Commemorating the 20th Anniversary of Mulieris Dignitatem: On the Dignity and Vocation of Women," proved to be one of the most powerful demonstrations I've ever seen about the importance of Catholic law schools, the power of Catholic legal thought, and the importance of interdisciplinary cooperation. The conference was a joint effort of two Catholic law schools -- Ave Maria School of Law and The Catholic Unversity of America's Columbus School of Law. The two organizers were Jane Adolphe of Ave Maria, and Helen Alvere, formerly at Catholic, now at George Mason Law School. Jane and Helen did an absolutely magnificant job of pulling together an international, indisciplinary gathering of scholars exploring the theological, philosophical, moral, AND legal dimensions of Pope John Paul II's challenge to apply the "dignity and vocation of women" to today's pressing social problems.
The presentations were all of exceptionally high quality, and the ways in which the different disciplines represented at the conference reinforced each other and illuminated different aspects of the topics addressed was extraordinary. It's truly impossible me to even identify "highlights", because of the uniformly high quality of the presentations. Among the legal scholars applying Catholic thought on women and men, filtered through the insights and challenges of Mulieris Dignitatem, were Helen Alvare (George Mason), Katherine Spaht (Louisiana State Law Center), Howard Bromberg (University of Michigan), and Fr. John Coughlin (Notre Dame) all dealing with different aspects of family law; Gerald Bradley (Notre Dame) discussing the concept of equality under Constitutional jurisprudence; me (with some general reflections on what Mary's role in the Incarnation and the founding of the Church reveals about the specific vocation of women in the law), Mary Leary (Catholic Law School) talking about the regulation of pornography and the dignity of the soul, Fr. Joseph Isanga (Ave Maria) addressing domestic violence, and Jane Adolphe (Ave Maria) on Amnesty International's abortion policies.
For a broader perspective, we heard Keynote Addresses from Maguerite Peeters, Director of the Institute for Intercultural Dialogue Dynamics, providing a sobering view of the international dimension of the situation of women, and Monsignor Grzegorz Kaszak, the Secretary of the Pontifical Council for the Family, with the view from the Vatican. We also heard from economists (Maria Sophia Aguirre, Catholic U.), sociologists (W. Bradford Wilcox, U of Virginia), philosophers (including one of my personal heroines, Sr. Prudence Allen), and theologians. Unfortunately, I had to leave before the very end, to catch my plane, so I had to miss how Helen Alvare and Teresa Collett (UST) were going to give us all our marching orders on future scholarship and other plans of action.....
I've never participated in a conference before where I have so urgently wanted to see all of the finished papers. They'll be published in Ave Maria Law Review. This is going to be a truly ground breaking collection of articles. Such scholarship simply would not exist if we didn't have Catholic law schools with the commitment to putting on conferences like this, Catholic scholars willing to dedicate the time and effort to applying their faith to their scholarship, and energetic and capable people like Jane Adolphe and Helen Alvare with the vision and energy to bring them all together!
Mark Stricherz's post, here, connects well with the various recent MOJ posts on the credit crisis, the economy generally, and CST.