Mirror of Justice

A blog dedicated to the development of Catholic legal theory.
Affiliated with the Program on Church, State & Society at Notre Dame Law School.

Sunday, July 12, 2009

St. Bernard, pray for us

St. Bernard of Montjoux is the patron saint of alpinists.  I'll be invoking him next week, when I'm climbing here:

"Catholicism as Antidote to Turbo-Capitalism"

Here!

Saturday, July 11, 2009

Dear Robert,

Amen!

A follow-up to Michael

 

 

Thanks to Michael Perry who has brought our attention to The New York Times article posted this afternoon regarding President Obama’s stirring speech given to the Ghanian Parliament. As Michael’s reference to the speech itself and to The New York Times article about it point out, the President noted that responsibility for the plight of Africa and its salvation does not rest with particular forces solely outside of Africa or inside.

 

Earlier today our President stated that,

Now, it's easy to point fingers and to pin the blame of these problems on others. Yes, a colonial map that made little sense helped to breed conflict. The West has often approached Africa as a patron or a source of resources rather than a partner. But the West is not responsible for the destruction of the Zimbabwean economy over the last decade, or wars in which children are enlisted as combatants. In my father's life, it was partly tribalism and patronage and nepotism in an independent Kenya that for a long stretch derailed his career, and we know that this kind of corruption is still a daily fact of life for far too many.

 

It may well be that the President has been listening to and taking stock of what the Pope, the Holy See, and those who represent it have been proposing for some time. For example, in 2007, the Holy See, through its Permanent Observer to the United Nations, offered parallel thoughts to those issued by the President today. In particular, Archbishop Celestino Migliore stated behalf of the Holy See and Pope Benedict that,

The international community is called to assist African countries develop policies that promote a culture of solidarity, so that their economic development may go hand in hand with integral human development. On the other hand, good governance and institution-building efforts, correct use of aid and anti-corruption measures are primary responsibilities of the recipient countries and are essential if international aid is to bear fruit.

 

I am certain we all share Michael’s pride in and endorsement of the President’s stirring remarks presented today in Ghana. But let us also acknowledge that some of his efforts to achieve good in the world, especially in those places most in need of it, have been preceded by those of others including the Roman Catholic Church and her exhortations over the years that have brought attention to the plight and promise of Africa. As we applaud the President, so, too, must we applaud those who have gone before in efforts to achieve the same noble goals for the betterment of humanity.

 

RJA sj

Should a faithful Catholic who is rich--i.e., "very rich"--be willing to pay more taxes to fund universal health care?

Here, here, and here.

Whether you voted for or against Obama, ...

... whether your name is Rick Garnett or John O'Callaghan or whatever--and even if you believe that the Holy Spirit picked Joseph Ratzinger to be pope (cf. here; BTW, Joseph Ratzinger himself [!] suggested, in effect, that for one who is familiar with the history of the papacy, such a claim is not plausible)--surely you can applaud this ... at least, this.  (Or was the speech no more than a predictable political stratagem?)

Here; here too.

_______________________________________________________________________________________

Who among those now living is more familiar with the history of the papacy than Rick's colleague, Notre Dame's Fr. Richard McBrien?  See here.

_______________________________________________________________________________________

Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger on the Holy Spirit and the papacy:

Speculating on the identity of the new pope prior to the conclave, the Rev. Richard John Neuhaus wrote in his “Rome Diary” that, once elected, “faithful Catholics will have no doubt that he is the choice of the Holy Spirit.” The new pope’s own view is more modest. Asked in 1997 whether the Holy Spirit picks the pope, Ratzinger responded: “I would say that the Spirit does not exactly take control of the affair, but rather like a good educator...leaves us much space, much freedom, without entirely abandoning us.... Probably the only assurance he offers is that the thing cannot be totally ruined. There are too many contrary instances of popes the Holy Spirit would obviously not have picked.”

Allen is justified, therefore, in claiming that when Ratzinger was made prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in 1981, he was “the first truly first-rate theologian to become the Pope’s top doctrinal authority since St. Robert Bellarmine in the sixteenth century.”

Read the rest, here.

Blessed John Newman on Catholic universities

Thanks to my colleague and MOJ-friend John O'Callaghan for sending this along:

Here, then, I conceive, is the object of the Holy See and the Catholic Church in setting up Universities; it is to reunite things which were in the beginning joined together by God, and have been put asunder by man. Some persons will say that I am thinking of confining, distorting, and stunting the growth of the intellect by ecclesiastical supervision. I have no such thought. Nor have I any thought of a compromise, as if religion must give up something, and science something. I wish the intellect to range with the utmost freedom, and religion to enjoy an equal freedom; but what I am stipulating for is, that they should be found in one and the same place, and exemplified in the same persons. I want to destroy that diversity of centres, which puts everything into confusion by creating a contrariety of influences. I wish the same spots and the same individuals to be at once oracles of philosophy and shrines of devotion. It will not satisfy me, what satisfies so many, to have two independent systems, intellectual and religious, going at once side by side, by a sort of division of labour, and only accidentally brought together. It will not satisfy me, if religion is here, and science there, and young men converse with science all day, and lodge with religion in the evening. It is not touching the evil, to which these remarks have been directed, if young men eat and drink and sleep in one place, and think in another: I want the same roof to contain both the intellectual and moral discipline. Devotion is not a sort of finish given to the sciences; nor is science a sort of feather in the cap, if I may so express myself, an ornament and set-off to devotion. I want the intellectual layman to be religious, and the devout ecclesiastic to be intellectual.

Obama is "more Catholic than the Pope"?

The claim that Pope Benedict XVI is a "liberal" was, I thought, implausible.  Now Kathleen Kennedy Townsend is upping the ante.  She contends, here, that "Barack Obama represents American Catholics better than the pope does."  "Notre Dame awarded the president an honorary degree," she concludes, "because it saw the need to highlight the best of Catholic teaching as applied to politics: the ability to open the eyes of those who would prefer to keep them closed, and to open the hearts of those who would prefer not to know the pain that their actions cause. The pope has a lot to learn about Catholic politics in America. Barack Obama can teach him." 

Wow!  (To be sure, there are those who would "prefer to keep [their eyes] closed" -- e.g., those who breezily brush aside questions about America's abortion-rights regime with quips about their "pay grade", or those who imagine that Pres. Obama is something other than a committed supporter of that regime.)

Townsend's mention of the Notre Dame honorary degree reminded me that one of the things I think was most regrettable about the decision, and the way it was defended and spun, was that the University allowed itself to be used to advance the President's (quite understandable, politically speaking) strategy of (subtly) separating American Catholics from their (not particularly popular at the moment) bishops and their authority.  Maybe Townsend's piece is a preview of the next move?  Having told American Catholics what the "right way" is to be Catholic (i.e., "don't be like that close-minded fuddy-duddy, Bishop D'arcy"), the President is now positioning himself as a model for what American Catholics should want in the (or, "their") Vicar of Christ.  Thanks, Ms. Townsend, but I think I'll stick with the one the Holy Spirit picked.

Welcome back to "Evangelical Catholicism"

After a two-year-or-so hiatus, the very interesting blog "Evangelical Catholicism" is back.  (Contributors Michael and Katerina had been blogging at Vox Nova. More here.)

John Allen, Notre Dame's Cathy Kaveny, and Others on Obama and the Vatican


New York Times

July 10, 2009

Does Obama Have a Friend in the Vatican?

Barack Obama and Pope Benedict XVIPhoto: Chris Helgren/Associated Press President Barack Obama and first lady Michelle Obama met with Pope Benedict XVI at the Vatican on Friday.

President Obama received a warm welcome at the Vatican on Friday in his first meeting with Pope Benedict XVI. Indeed, the Vatican has generally seemed more eager to form a relationship with Mr. Obama than many American bishops, who have been cooler because he differs from the church on abortion and other reproductive issues. The invitation Mr. Obama received to deliver the commencement speech at the University of Notre Dame, for instance, triggered strong public condemnation from conservative bishops.

Why does the American Catholic leadership seem to be focused on abortion, while the Vatican appears willing to view that issue as merely one among many on which to judge a political leader?

[You can read the commentary, here.]