Mirror of Justice

A blog dedicated to the development of Catholic legal theory.
Affiliated with the Program on Church, State & Society at Notre Dame Law School.

Monday, March 5, 2007

Embryonic Stem Cell Research

The current issue of America has published an essay in which I compare the justification for engaging in potentially risky prenatal testing such as amniocentesis with the justification for embryonic stem cell research.  The article begins:

The Disabled Jesus

I know something about hope, enough at least to know what Senator Bill Frist meant when he said during a debate on funding embryonic stem cell research: “If your daughter has diabetes, if your father has Parkinson’s, if your sister has a spinal cord injury, your views will be swayed more powerfully than you can imagine by the hope that a cure will be found in those magnificent cells, recently discovered, that today originate only in an embryo.” ...

(Unfortunately, only this beginning of the essay is available online without a subscription to America.)

In the rest of the essay, I go on to suggest that if new techniques for obtaining embryonic stem cells without destroying the embryos are ever perfected, the Church might endorse such techniques, just as it currently endorses prenatal diagnostic techniques that "do not involve disproportionate risks for the child and the mother"  (Evangelium Vitae 63).  However, since no such techniques currently exist, the Church correctly draws a bright line with respect to embryonic stem cell research. 

Reviving Organized Labor

As we enter our fourth year at MoJ, we haven't devoted a lot of time to developing a Catholic legal theory of labor relations.  Over at Commonweal, Eduardo brings the issue to the foreground.  Does our lack of attention to this issue reflect our diminishing confidence in the continued relevance of the Church's teaching on labor unions, or does it mean that we've been captured by our culture and have lost sight of the Church's still-vital teaching?

Biology and Belief

If you haven't read it yet, check out the cover story from the New York Times Magazine exploring the relationship between evolution and belief in God:

Which is the better biological explanation for a belief in God — evolutionary adaptation or neurological accident? Is there something about the cognitive functioning of humans that makes us receptive to belief in a supernatural deity? And if scientists are able to explain God, what then? Is explaining religion the same thing as explaining it away? Are the nonbelievers right, and is religion at its core an empty undertaking, a misdirection, a vestigial artifact of a primitive mind? Or are the believers right, and does the fact that we have the mental capacities for discerning God suggest that it was God who put them there?

" ... for those of us interested in how, if at all, religion can influence civil society ..."

MOJ friend Gerry Whyte writes:

The Irish State has recently established a formal forum for dialogue with faith communities and it held its first meeting last week.  You will find the speech of the Taoiseach (Prime Minister) opening the session at

http://www.taoiseach.gov.ie/index.asp?locID=558&docID=3257

It makes for an interesting read for those of us interested in how, if at all, religion can influence civil society.

Freedom and Truth

Johannes Baptist Metz's short book "Poverty of the Spirit" is IMHO a spiritual masterpiece.  As I was re-reading it yesterday, I also saw that it had some rich fare for the anthropological underpinnings of CLT. 

Unlike other animals, "Being is entrusted to us as a summons, which we are each to accept and consciously acknowledge.  We are never simply a being that is 'there' and 'ready-made,' just for the asking.  From the very start we are something that can Be, a being that must win selfhood and decide what it is to be.  We must fully become what we are - a human being.  To become human through the exercise of our freedom - that is the law of our being.

"Now this freedom, which leaves us to ourselves, is not pure arbitrariness or unchecked whim; it is not devoid of law and necessity.  It reveals itself at work when we accept and approve with all our heart the being that is committed to us...  The inescapable 'truth' of our Being is such that it makes our freedom possible rather than threatening it (cf. Jn. 8:32).  Thus the free process of becoming a human being unfolds as a process of service.  In biblical terms it is 'obedience' (cf. Phil 2:8) and faithfulness to the humanity entrusted to us."

Metz then describes the many temptations - the attempts to evade, ignore, or rebel against our humanity.  "In short, we can fail to obey this truth [of our Being],thus aborting the work of becoming a human being."

Sunday, March 4, 2007

THE PLOT THICKENS ...

Against the backlground of two earlier posts--one by me and one by Rick--some MOJ-readers, many of whom are law students, will be interested in this article:

New York Times
March 4, 2007

A New Mystery to Prosecutors: Their Lost Jobs
By DAVID JOHNSTONERIC LIPTON and WILLIAM YARDLEY

WASHINGTON, March 3 — After Daniel G. Bogden got the call in December telling him that he was being dismissed as the United States attorney in Nevada, he pressed for an explanation.

Mr. Bogden, who was named the top federal prosecutor in Nevada in 2001 after 11 years of working his way up at the Justice Department, asked an official at the agency’s headquarters if the firing was related to his performance or to that of his office. “That didn’t enter into the equation,” he said he was told.

After several more calls, Mr. Bogden reached a senior official who offered an answer. “There is a window of opportunity to put candidates into an office like mine,” Mr. Bogden said, recalling the conversation. “They were attempting to open a slot and bring someone else in.”

The ouster of Mr. Bogden and seven other United States attorneys has set off a furor in Washington that took the Bush administration by surprise.

Summoning five of the dismissed prosecutors for hearings on Tuesday, the newly empowered Congressional Democrats have charged that the mass firing is a political purge, intended to squelch corruption investigations or install less independent-minded successors.

Interviews with several of the prosecutors, Justice Department officials, lawmakers and others provide new details and a fuller picture of the events behind the dismissals. Like Mr. Bogden, some prosecutors believe they were forced out for replacements who could gild résumés; several heard that favored candidates had been identified.

[To read the rest of the article, click here.]

Taking Citizenship From Descendents of Former Slaves

Yesterday, the Cherokee Nation voted to strip the descendents of its former slaves of tribal citizenship.  Here is an excerpt from the Washington Post (before yesterday’s vote).  For the full article, click here.  How would one approaching law from the perspective of Catholic Legal Theory analyze this issue?

Cherokee Nation To Vote on Expelling Slaves' Descendants

By Ellen Knickmeyer

Washington

Post Staff Writer
Saturday, March 3, 2007; A01

VINITA,

Okla.

-- J.D. Baldridge, 73, has official government documents showing him to be a descendant of a full-blood Cherokee. He has memories of a youth spent among Cherokee neighbors and kin, at tribal stomp dances and hog fries. He holds on to a fair amount of Cherokee vocabulary. " Salali," Baldridge says, his face creasing into a smile at the word. "Squirrel stew. Oh, that was good."

What Baldridge, a retired

Oklahoma

county sheriff, also has is at least one black ancestor, a former slave of a Cherokee family. That could get Baldridge cast out of the tribe, along with thousands of others.

The 250,000-member Cherokee Nation will vote in a special election today whether to override a 141-year-old treaty and change the tribal constitution to bar "freedmen," the descendants of former tribal slaves, from being members of the sovereign nation.

"It's a basic, inherent right to determine our own citizenry. We paid very dearly for those rights," Cherokee Principal Chief Chad Smith said in an interview last month in

Oklahoma City

.

But the Cherokee freedmen see the vote as less about self-determination than about discrimination and historical blinders. They see in the referendum hints of racism and a desire by some Cherokees to deny the tribe's slave-owning past.

"They know these people exist. And they're trying to push them aside, as though they were never with them," said Andra Shelton, one of Baldridge's family members.

Shelton

, 59, can recall her mother gossiping in fluent Cherokee when Cherokee friends and relatives visited.

People on both sides of the issue say the fight is also about tribal politics -- the freedmen at times have been at odds with the tribal leadership -- and about money.

Friday, March 2, 2007

Intellectual Property and the Preferential Option for the Poor

I've posted on SSRN this paper, arising out of Villanova's fine conference last fall on The Meaning of the Preferential Option for the Poor for Law and Policy.  Here's part of the the abstract:

IP lies at the heart of debates over globalization and whether it is working to help poor nations or to impose new costs on them while increasing the wealthy nations' relative advantages. The Catholic Church has weighed in on these issues, most clearly in favor of limiting patent rights over essential medicines for combating AIDS and other epidemics. . . .

. . . Intellectual property, like other forms of property, serves important purposes related to human dignity, productivity, and (especially) creativity, and Catholic teaching therefore affirms it. But for a variety of reasons, limits on intellectual property are equally important: the full extension of IP rights may harm the poor, and certain limits on those rights are important to benefiting and empowering the poor. In particular, certain existing or proposed limits on IP rights can resonate with Catholic concepts such as maintenance of the common good and the importance of subsidiary organizations defined neither by the state nor by the market. And expressions of skepticism in Catholic thought about bureaucratic approaches to the poor reflected in the social assistance state have relatively little application to the kind of limits on IP rights that may be adopted to empower the poor.

Tom

Blogging hiatus

For the next several days, I'll be in Heaven, a.k.a., Little Cottonwood Canyon, near Salt Lake City.  (Brigham Young was right:  "This is the place.")  So, no blogging for me.  Feel free, however, to click here for the snow report.

The best colleges for Catholics

Here's a question -- a "bleg", some call it -- for all MOJ-ers and readers:  Which colleges and universities are best for Catholics?  Now, I do not mean to limit the possibilities to Catholic colleges and universities.  Are there places -- Catholic or not -- where the Catholic community is particularly strong, where the Catholic campus ministry is particularly good, where scholars (Catholic and not) are noteworthy for taking seriously religious perspectives, questions, and commitments?  Are there any resources out there that might answer this question?