Mirror of Justice

A blog dedicated to the development of Catholic legal theory.
Affiliated with the Program on Church, State & Society at Notre Dame Law School.

Wednesday, July 20, 2011

A long interview with Archbishop Chaput

John Allen has a (characteristically) helpful and revealing interview with Philadelphia's new archbishop, Arbp. Charles Chaput.  And, the folks at First Things have done a great job collecting a dozen-or-so essays he's done for that journal.  Readers might also want to take a look at Arbp. Chaput's book, "Render Unto Caesar:  Serving the Nation by Living Our Catholic Beliefs in Political Life," which was thoughtfully reviewed by Fr. Robert Imbelli, here.

The Church in Philadelphia is facing real challenges, to put it mildly, and so I would hope that all Catholics would pray for that great city's new Archbishop.

  

Friday, July 15, 2011

Anderson on Brooks and the "Good, Short Life"

Ryan Anderson has a nice response, at NRO, to David Brooks's column on "The Good, Short Life."  Among other things, Anderson observes:

One can recognize that rising health-care costs, particularly at the end of life, are bankrupting our nation and thus failing to serve the common good without concluding that this entails that the lives of those with terminal diseases are no longer worth living. Between the two extremes of intentionally killing and prolonging life at all costs lies a virtuous mean of accepting death when the alternatives prove disproportionate.

In fact, this is just what Pope John Paul the Great, in his last act of public teaching, taught the world as he humbly accepted his death — neither deeming life with Parkinson’s disease unworthy of living (and thus killing himself) nor demanding every life-sustaining treatment (irrespective of cost, likelihood of success, and alternative uses for scarce resources).

As we continue our national discussion about the cost of care at the end of life, we should keep these distinctions in mind.

Horwitz on public schools, politics, and First Amendment institutions

Paul Horwitz has a typically thoughtful post up at Prawfsblawg on the question of "political" control of what is taught in public schools.  The occasion for the post is a new law in California that requires public schools to teach about the contributions of gay and lesbian history to state and national history.  Check it out.

Thursday, July 14, 2011

Bastille Day, the Vendee, and "genocide"

From The Telegraph, "Vendee French call for revolution massacre to be termed 'genocide'": 

. . . Historians believe that around 170,000 Vendéeans were killed in the peasant war and the subsequent massacres – and around 5,000 in the noyades.

When it was over, French General Francois Joseph Westermann penned a letter to the Committee of Public Safety stating: "There is no more Vendée... According to the orders that you gave me, I crushed the children under the feet of the horses, massacred the women who, at least for these, will not give birth to any more brigands. I do not have a prisoner to reproach me. I have exterminated all." . . .

 

Maybe I'll have some Burke (and O'Brien) with my Bordeaux today.

 

Remember the Vendee

Here is an article, from today's Telegraph, noting that some in France are urging, on this Bastille Day, for the anti-Catholic massacres by the revolutionaries to be recognized as "genocide."  Read this essay, "Remembering the Vendee", by Sophie Masson. 

Some Bastille Day reading

Here is Conor Cruise O'Brien, on Edmund Burke and his Reflections on the Revolution in France.

(Strongly) recommended reading: "Atticus"

I was late in discovering the wonderful fiction of Ron Hansen, but I'm trying to make up for the delay now.  I cannot recommend highly enough his novel, "Atticus," which I read on the plane the other day.  I'm more and more in agreement with this reviewer, who puts Hansen up there with Flanner O'Connor and Walker Percy.

Wednesday, July 6, 2011

Religious liberty and SSM in New York

Following up on some other MOJers' recent posts (e.g., Rob, Fr. Araujo, Russ, and Steve), here is Matthew Franck, commenting on the uncertain future but continued importance of religious liberty.  In Franck's view, the religious-liberty protections contained in the recently enacted SSM law in New York are "woefully inadequate[.]"  We'll see.  It has been a premise of the letters that Tom Berg and I, and several others, have submitted to legislatures considering changes to their states' marriage laws that it is possible to find compromises that meaningfully protect religious freedom while moving to authorize and legally recognize same-sex civil marriages.  I hope that premise is sound. 

Great stuff -- much of it by MOJers -- in the new Journal of Christian Legal Thought

The new Journal of Christian Legal Thought -- which has been launched by Michael Schutt and the other good folks at the Christian Legal Society -- is available online.  Volume 1, No. 1 features (among other things) several dozen short essays on great works by important Christian thinkers about law (and related matters).  Check it out, and read bits by, inter alia, Tom Berg, Patrick Brennan, Marc DeGirolami, me, Robby George, Kevin Lee, Michael Scaperlanda, Lisa Schiltz, Susan Stabile, Amy Uelmen, and Rob Vischer on, inter alia, Reinhold Niebuhr, Joseph Vining, James Fitzjames Stephen, Jacques Maritain, John Finnis, Robert Cover, Josef Pieper, and John Henry Newman.

Whew!  All this and more, in just 44 pages!  Download and read today!

Monday, July 4, 2011

Declaring our dependence (on God)

It's from last July, but I still really like Archbishop Dolan's (In)dependence Day message, "Declaring our Dependence (on God)."  A good moral-anthropology thought, on this so-important-in-the-history-of-the-world occasion:

My friend Cardinal Francis George, the Archbishop of Chicago, comments that perhaps the most revolutionary statement we can make these days is the opening line of the creed, "We believe in God, the Father Almighty... " as we pray at every Sunday Mass.

We look forward to all the festivities of our national holiday, the Fourth of July, this weekend.

We call it Independence Day, celebrating our independence from England, sealed on July 4, 1776, won at the cost of the blood of brave patriots during the Revolutionary War.

However, to profess our faith that "We believe in God, the Father Almighty... " is actually an act of dependence: we admit that every breath we take, each day we have, every opportunity we are given, come from an omnipotent God, and we bask in the fact that we are totally dependent upon Him. He is sovereign, He is Lord, He has power and dominion. "Without Him, we can do nothing; with Him, nothing is impossible."

Yes, this spiritual Declaration of Dependence is downright revolutionary. For today, it is chic to throw off—not the shackles of allegiance to King George, as our brave patriots gallantly did—but any sense of obedience to God, His revelation and the basic code of right and wrong He has engraved upon the human heart. . . .