Mirror of Justice

A blog dedicated to the development of Catholic legal theory.
Affiliated with the Program on Church, State & Society at Notre Dame Law School.

Tuesday, November 27, 2012

"The Naked Private Square"

Prof. Ronald Colombo (Hofstra) has posted a really interesting paper called "The Naked Private Square," which talks about the free-exercise rights of business corporations.  Timely stuff!  Here's the abstract:

In the latter half of the twentieth century, America witnessed the construction of a “wall of separation” between religion and the public square. What had once been commonplace (such as prayer in public schools, and religious symbols on public property) had suddenly become verboten. This phenomenon is well known and has been well studied. 

Less well known (and less well studied) has been the parallel phenomenon of religion’s expulsion from the private square. Employment law, corporate law, and constitutional law have worked to impede the ability of business enterprises to adopt, pursue, and maintain distinctively religious personae. This is undesirable because religious freedom does not truly and fully exist if religion expression and practice is restricted to the private quarters of one’s home or temple. 

Fortunately, a corrective to this situation exists: recognition of the right to free exercise of religion on the part of business corporations. Such a right has been long in the making, and the jurisprudential trajectory of the courts (especially the U.S. Supreme Court), combined with the increased assertion of this right against certain elements of the current regulatory onslaught, suggests that its recognition is imminent.

 

"Government for the Time Being"

Prof. Bill Brewbaker (Alabama) has posted on SSRN his contribution to an Austin Sarat-edited volume, Matters of Faith (to which I also contributed).  Here is the abstract to Bill's paper, "Government for the Time Being":

This short paper is a response to Steven Smith’s argument for an institutional understanding of the Establishment Clause. It challenges Smith’s dismissive posture toward the classical understanding of the “secular.” The classical understanding takes secular to refer “to this time and this world (as opposed to some other time or world, such as ‘eternity’ or the hereafter,” rather than simply denoting a “nonreligious” viewpoint. By focusing on three presuppositions underlying the classical account — (1) the kingship of God, (2) the presence of the church, and (3) the expectation of a world-to-come — the paper argues that the classical account provides a more robust limitation on government than is commonly assumed.

 

Friday, November 23, 2012

"The Holy Feast of the Intransitive Verb"

Here's a really nice essay, from 1999, by my friend Seamus Hasson, reminding us that one gives "thanks" to someone, or Someone, and not simply for something.

Tuesday, November 20, 2012

A great image

UPDATE:  For more on the Breezy Point Madonna, see this NYT story.  Note also that the image comes to us thanks to Mark Lennihan and Associated Press. 

 

Thursday, November 15, 2012

Some doubts about John Dewey as the "philosopher of the common good"

Michael Perry has linked to Charles Reid's suggestion that, in the wake of the election, we look to John Dewey -- described as the "philosopher of the common good" -- for optimism and inspiration.  It seems to me that we should look elsewhere. 

John Dewey's "optimism" and "egalitarianism" included -- indeed, his approach had at its heart -- a deep antipathy to religious authority and truth-claims, and indeed to any significant role for non-state mediating associations in the formation and education of persons.  Dewey praised Paul Blanshard's anti-Catholic screeds, and in some ways inspired them.  Charles notes, of course, that praise of Dewey needs to be "qualified," and says that he "appreciate[s] the diversity religious education offers in a world where public education might otherwise become too homogeneous."  As he should, and as Dewey -- an implacable enemy of the Catholic schools -- did not. 

I wonder, does Michael endorse Reid's endorsement of Dewey?  Why or why not? 

Wednesday, November 14, 2012

California votes to keep the death penalty

There was some good news (e.g., the vote in Massachusetts to reject legalized euthanasia) on the pro-life front, but -- in my view -- the news was mostly very bad.  (I'm not among those who think that Pres. Obama's administration and policies are helpfully characterized as "pro-life.)" 

One piece of bad news that has gone relatively unnoticed is the vote in California to retain the death penalty.  My sense is that the Democratic Party, which certainly does not suffer for lack of influence in California's politics, did little to try to secure abolition in California, which would have been huge.  But, of course, with few exceptions (like Sen. Feingold), Democrats have, even when in control of government (see, e.g., 2008-2010 at the national level) have done little to try to move the ball on capital punishment, while at the same time benefitting from the arguments of the "neither party is really pro-life; the GOP is anti-abortion but the Democrats oppose capital punishment" variety.

I oppose capital punishment, but also believe its use is constitutional, and that it should not be abolished (overtly or gradually) by federal courts.  It should be abolished through politics.  So, the California decision is a disappointment.  It would be nice if the party in power in that state took steps to abolish it.

Saturday, November 10, 2012

One answer to our present questions: "Renewing hospitality"

Unhealthily gloomy (or triumphalistic) about Tuesday's election-results, and what they tell us about our divisions, disagreements, and challenges?  One suggestion, Anna Williams suggests, at First Things, strikes me as a really good one:  "More dinner parties."  Count me in.

Thursday, November 8, 2012

"The Final Gladness"

A book that really changed my life is Fr. James Schall, S.J.'s, Another Sort of Learning (buy it here). I gather that he has announced his plans to retire from Georgetown University.  Here (HT:  First Things) is the announcement of his "last lecture", "The Final Gladness", at Georgetown, on December 7.  Seriously:  If you are in D.C., don't miss this.

NDCEC Fall Conference: "Justice: The Crowning Glory of the Virtues"

One of my favorite events of the year is upon us:  The Notre Dame Center for Ethics and Culture -- founded by David Solomon and now led by Carter Snead -- is hosting its annual Fall Conference.  Here's the line-up.  If you are in or near South Bend, come on down!  Many highlights, including a moderated conversation between Robby George and Michael Sandel on "The Moral Limits of Markets", and a lecture by Alasdair MacIntyre, "Catholic Instead of What?"  

And, for the early-morning crowd (or the all-night Justice-contemplators), you can come hear, Saturday morning at 10:30, Paul Horwitz, Michael Moreland, and your humble correspondent present on "religious liberty and justice."  Horwitz and Moreland will, of course, be great.

Here's the conference blurb:

In his famous work, De Officiis, Marcus Tullius Cicero wrote that in justice, we see “the crowning glory of the virtues.” Countless treatises, encyclicals, verses, and artistic endeavors by a vast array of philosophers, theologians, poets, and  painters have explored the manifold aspects of justice, particularly its meaning and its manifestation in our souls and societies.  

The Notre Dame Center for Ethics and Culture will devote its thirteenth annual Fall conference to the theme: The Crowning Glory of the Virtues: Exploring the Many Facets of Justice. In customary interdisciplinary fashion, this conference will take up  the many questions related to both the nature of justice and the varied  and often-conflicting ideas of how to establish justice in our hearts  and in our world.  These questions will be pursued in the disciplinary contexts of philosophy,  theology, political theory, law, history, economics, the biosciences,  literature, and the arts. 

 

George, Anderson, and Girgis, "What Is Marriage?"

Congratulations to our fellow MOJ-er Robby George, and to his colleagues Sherif Girgis and Ryan Anderson, on the publication of What Is Marriage?  Man and Woman:  A DefenseHere's the Amazon page.  (Here's an online essay, by Ryan Anderson, which sets out, in shorter form, parts of their argument.)  And, of course, you can go to the Facebook page and "like" it!