Gedicks is great . . . but wrong about exemptions and the Establishment Clause

As Michael Perry notes, Prof. Fred Gedicks -- one of the more prolific and important law-and-religion scholars of his generation -- argues that it would violate the Establishment Clause to exempt Hobby Lobby (et al.) from the contraception-coverage mandate.  Other important and accomplished scholars have also made this claim.  But, as Marc DeGirolami has explained, in this MOJ post, the argument is not persuasive.