Saturday, April 27, 2013
The Republican Party and Same-Sex Marriage
As MOJ readers know, the Republican Party has stood proudly in opposition to same-sex marriage--more precisely, in opposition to admitting same-sex couples to civil marriage. So this development, reported in today's NYT, is quite interesting:
When the Rhode Island State Senate tallied up the votes against a same-sex marriage bill passed there on Wednesday, something was missing: Republicans.
All five of the chamber’s Republican lawmakers had voted for the bill, stunning opponents and sending the measure to the governor’s desk and almost-certain victory next week.
The vote reflected not only the rapidly shifting tides of public opinion on same-sex marriage, but also the influence of a new Republican advocacy group called the American Unity Fund, which spent weeks helping the state’s gay rights organization cultivate Republican senators.
Now the group is preparing a major push in Washington and in state capitals intended to reshape the Republican Party, by building support for same-sex marriage and bolstering its acceptance among candidates and party activists around the country.
Founded and financed by some of the country’s leading Republican fund-raisers and strategists, the fund expects to raise up to $7 million this year, officials said. The fund’s organizers include Paul E. Singer and Clifford S. Asness, libertarian-leaning New York investors; David Herro, a prominent Chicago money manager; and Seth Klarman, a billionaire Boston philanthropist and hedge fund manager.
“The concept of gay unions fits very well within our framework of individual liberty and our belief that strong families make for a stronger society,” Mr. Singer said in an e-mail. “The institution of marriage is in very bad shape in this country, yet gay and lesbian couples want very much to be a part of it, to live as committed husbands and wives with their children in traditional family units. This should be what we want as conservatives, for people to cherish and respect this model and to want it for themselves.”
The fund is one of several advocacy organizations backed by wealthy Republicans and business leaders to shift their party’s stance in recent months on issues like immigration and same-sex marriage. And the new effort traces a rift between Republican elites and grass-roots voters over a handful of hot-button social issues that one group views as handcuffing the party and the other sees as essential to its identity.
You can read the rest here. Of course, and as the article reports, this development is not without its critics, of whom there are many--including, no doubt, some of you.
https://mirrorofjustice.blogs.com/mirrorofjustice/2013/04/the-republican-party-and-same-sex-marriage.html
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the
comment feed
for this post.
Rhode Island is something of an atypical state -- it is very Democratic and the Republicans are akin to Dems in some very red state. Even the Dems are a bit atypical -- Rhode Island, e.g., was anomaly as a voter id state (if a weaker form) supported by Democrats. But, Ted Olson on down does suggest that same sex marriage, which can be defended on conservative grounds (after all, some on the GLBT left are wary about marriage as too conformist), is something Republicans can support. You can be for small government and/or economic conservative polices while being pro-marriage equality.