Tuesday, February 26, 2013
File under "Interesting Developments"
It is reported in the NYT this morning (here) that "Republicans Sign Brief in Support of Gay Marriage". One of those Republicans is former Utah governor--and also former, and possibly future, presidential candidate--Jon Huntsman. In an article published just last week in The American Conservative (here), Governor Huntsman wrote:
"While serving as governor of Utah, I pushed for civil unions and expanded reciprocal benefits for gay citizens. I did so not because of political pressure—indeed, at the time 70 percent of Utahns were opposed—but because as governor my role was to work for everybody, even those who didn’t have access to a powerful lobby. Civil unions, I believed, were a practical step that would bring all citizens more fully into the fabric of a state they already were—and always had been—a part of.
That was four years ago. Today we have an opportunity to do more: conservatives should start to lead again and push their states to join the nine others that allow all their citizens to marry. I’ve been married for 29 years. My marriage has been the greatest joy of my life. There is nothing conservative about denying other Americans the ability to forge that same relationship with the person they love.
All Americans should be treated equally by the law, whether they marry in a church, another religious institution, or a town hall. This does not mean that any religious group would be forced by the state to recognize relationships that run counter to their conscience. Civil equality is compatible with, and indeed promotes, freedom of conscience.
Marriage is not an issue that people rationalize through the abstract lens of the law; rather it is something understood emotionally through one’s own experience with family, neighbors, and friends. The party of Lincoln should stand with our best tradition of equality and support full civil marriage for all Americans."
https://mirrorofjustice.blogs.com/mirrorofjustice/2013/02/file-under-interesting-developments.html
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the
comment feed
for this post.
Thank you for this post. I particularly like this quotation from today's New York Times: "[The brief] argues, as [Mr. Olson] does, that same-sex marriage promotes family values by allowing children of gay couples to grow up in two-parent homes. . . ." I have never understood the arguments to the contrary. It seems to me, and always has, that allowing same-sex couples to marry demonstrates profound respect for the institution of marriage and provides maximum protection and stability to the children of the relationships in question. Surely no one expects religious institutions that oppose the concept to perform such marriages. On the other hand, there is no reason that I can see to allow such institutions to prevent those who seek the emotional and legal benefits of marriage from gaining access to those benefits. Why should such institutions care, as long as no one is asking them to perform the marriages?