Wednesday, September 5, 2012
Review of Judge Wilkinson's Book
https://mirrorofjustice.blogs.com/mirrorofjustice/2012/09/review-of-judge-wilkinsons-book.html
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the
comment feed
for this post.
Great job, Mark, as always. For what it's worth, I'm fairly sympathetic to Judge Wilkinson's (and your?) take, but I think he overstates his critique of originalism. Sure, there is the potential for abuse connected with the method, as with any method, but I've found his criticisms of (if I remember correctly) Heller and Citizens United (both of which seem quite clearly correct to me, and not for any "cosmic" reasons) overdone. The challenge, as I see it, is not in "being restrained", full stop, but in distinguishing the situations (and there *are*, almost everyone admits, such situations) when judicial invalidation is required by the judge's oath from those when it is not. No small challenge, right? =-) After all the "right to self-governance", while "inalienable", is not absolute. We've ruled out -- self-paternalism, and all that -- certain outcomes, and I think (at *some* point) courts may and must enforce the constraints that we put on ourselves.