Saturday, September 3, 2011
Scruton on Icons, Brands, the Sacred, and the Profane
Roger Scruton is one of my favorite writers on aesthetics. In this piece, he discusses a new book on icons, "From Christ to Coke: How Image Becomes Icon," by Martin Kemp. Perhaps channeling a little Mircea Eliade, Scruton writes that the difference between icons and brands is in the "sacredness" of the object. A bit from the essay below. (x-posted CLR Forum)
Things become sacred when sacrifices on behalf of the community have been distilled in them, as the sacrifices of generations of soldiers, sailors and airmen are distilled in the American flag. And sacred things are invitations to sacrifice, as is the flag in time of war. Sacred things create bridges across generations: they tell us that the dead and the unborn are present among us, and that their “real presence” lives in each of us, and each of us in it. The decline of religion has deprived us of sacred things. But it has not deprived us of the need for them. Nor has it deprived us of the acute sense of desecration we feel, when facetious images intrude at the places once occupied by these visitors from the transcendental.
https://mirrorofjustice.blogs.com/mirrorofjustice/2011/09/scruton-on-icons-brands-the-sacred-and-the-profane.html
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the
comment feed
for this post.
Here's an intriguing and welcome attempt to de-sacralize (profane?) a person long prominently featured in Leftist iconography: http://jacobinmag.com/blog/?p=1520#more-1520
(As you know, I avow identification with the Left side of Mirabeau's 'geography of the Assembly.')