Tuesday, April 12, 2011
Politics and the Devil
The folks at Public Discourse have made available a version of a lecture that Archbishop Charles Chaput gave at Notre Dame recently. The lecture was part of a new Right to Life Lecture Series (organized by the students). Very much worth a read. A taste:
. . . All law in some sense teaches and forms us, while also regulating our behavior. The same applies to our public policies, including the ones that govern our scientific research. There is no such thing as morally neutral legislation or morally neutral public policy. Every law is the public expression of what somebody thinks we “ought” to do. The question that matters is this: Which moral convictions of which somebodies are going to shape our country’s political and cultural future—including the way we do our science?
The answer is pretty obvious: if you and I as citizens don’t do the shaping, then somebody else will. That is the nature of a democracy. A healthy democracy depends on people of conviction working hard to advance their ideas in the public square—respectfully and peacefully, but vigorously and without apologies. Politics always involves the exercise of power in the pursuit of somebody’s idea of the common good. And politics always and naturally involves the imposition of somebody’s values on the public at large. So if a citizen fails to bring his moral beliefs into our country’s political conversation, if he fails to work for them publicly and energetically, then the only thing he ensures is the defeat of his own beliefs. . . .
https://mirrorofjustice.blogs.com/mirrorofjustice/2011/04/politics-and-the-devil.html
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the
comment feed
for this post.
It sounds like a pretty "us against them" vision of democracy (with "them" being on the side of the devil). Don't most of us consider that in America, there are a lot of SHARED values? He says, "And politics *always* and *naturally* involves the imposition of somebody’s values on the public at large." But isn't the usual criticism of Catholic culture warriors that they are trying to impose their values on those who are not Catholic? It seems like Archbishop Chaput is acknowledging that it is. I would rather think of democracy as first finding shared values; second, where there are not shared values, trying (if possible) to set up a framework so that all may live according to their values without interfering with others; and third, imposing values only when it becomes absolutely necessary.
I would like to know exactly how the devil is involved in all of this. By what mechanism does he (and like all major players, the devil is male, no matter what Elizabeth Johnson says) involve himself in politics?