Mirror of Justice

A blog dedicated to the development of Catholic legal theory.
Affiliated with the Program on Church, State & Society at Notre Dame Law School.

Wednesday, December 15, 2010

Incest is cancer

If concern for the traditional family unit is not enough to justify opposition to same-sex marriage, is it enough to justify opposition to adult incest?  Will Saletan makes the case for continuing the moral taboo against adult incest, even if our society has grown less comfortable condemning decisions between consenting adults pertaining to sex.

https://mirrorofjustice.blogs.com/mirrorofjustice/2010/12/incest-is-cancer.html

Vischer, Rob | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515a9a69e20148c6c40f8d970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Incest is cancer :

Comments


                                                        Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I agree with Saletan. One could even go so to the theorist Rene Girard. Girard posited that certain practices were forbidden because of the tendency they had to undermine stability in society. Incest, as a root cause of familial mimetic violence, would naturally fall under such a prohibition. This makes sense — what mother, without a societal prohibition on incest, could fail to see a daughter as a rival to her affections with her husband, and begin to desire the daughter’s demise? And vice-versa, the husband and son? Removing such a prohibition would tend to undermine the stability of any society, and the very survival of the species. Cousins and remoter relations would remove the instant possibility of such violence, and so the prohibition would not obtain.