Mirror of Justice

A blog dedicated to the development of Catholic legal theory.
Affiliated with the Program on Church, State & Society at Notre Dame Law School.

Friday, November 12, 2010

"Abortion Law is Family Law"

So argues Helen Alvare, in this piece, published at Public Discourse.  (The piece is adapted from her remarks at the recent "Open Hearts" conference at Princeton.)  Here's a bit:

Questions about “abortion and the law” are usually seen as matters of constitutional law. Constitutional law, however, seems ill-suited. This is not only because the U.S. Supreme Court discovered a “constitutional right” for something that had been banned by most states for most of the nation’s history. It is also because the “privacy” right encompassing abortion frames the issue as a struggle between the state and the woman over her right to define her life, her future, or even her “concept …of the universe,” in the famous words of the Casey Court. But it is becoming increasingly apparent that abortion is about family relationships, not simply a contest between the state and a woman who happens to be pregnant. Scientific discoveries about human development and the testimonies of women who have had or have considered an abortion suggest that it is family law rather than constitutional law that provides the best means of understanding the issue of abortion.

https://mirrorofjustice.blogs.com/mirrorofjustice/2010/11/abortion-law-is-family-law.html

Garnett, Rick | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515a9a69e20133f5cbb55c970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference "Abortion Law is Family Law" :

Comments


                                                        Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

The thought has often occurred to me that abortion may be thought of in terms of parental rights (or parental rights taken too far, depending on your position). I made a mental connection to abortion when I saw this episode of Religion and Ethics Newsweekly:
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/episodes/may-15-2009/faith-healing-court-cases/2961/

Laws vary from state to state, but parents who do not get conventional medical treatment for their children -- and instead rely on some type of faith healing -- are often exempt from prosecution, or are not prosecuted, when the children die.

As for post-abortion suffering, I see no reason why it should not be treated seriously. But on the other hand, I think it would be only in exceptional cases that a woman would be advised to avoid *childbirth* because of the risk of post-partum depression. Post-partum depression in no way implies that pregnancy and childbirth are bad decisions. I think trying to use post-abortion suffering or post-abortion regrets as a means to try to criminalize abortion would require well documented evidence that a huge proportion of women experienced suffering or regrets, and even then, for those who believe in a right to choose, I can't see how it could be argued that anyone should be stopped from freely choosing to do something on the grounds that they would probably regret it later.