A clarification

One reader thought i was insulting Micheal P. I'm sorry to have given that impression. I in no way wished to denigrate either his arguments or his honesty. Rather, I had gotten the impression from his prior statements like  "I am a post-metaphysical, apophatic Catholic/Christian."  that as a matter of intellectual judgment he might have come to the conclusion that truth does not exist, or at least is not accessible to us.   If that were in fact his view, and I did not reach a conclusion on this point, I would not see how  lengthy conversation could be fruitful. ("De gustibus ..." and all that sort of thing.)