John Breen's Puzzling Criticism

John Breen says. in his "Sebelius, Michael Perry, and Setting the Record Straight" post (here) that I "very incompletely report[ed] . . . an e-mail exchange between myself and a law professor who is a regular reader of MOJ – a person who has asked to remain anonymous."  What I reported--very completely reported--was the initial e-mail from the professor, whom we shall call P, which P sent to John; P cc.'ed me.  John could have posted P's e-mail message to him and then posted his response.  He chose not to.  So, with P's permission, I posted P's e-mail to John.  Now, John complains that I did not also post John's response to P's e-mail.  But, of course, John can post his own messages here.  John is an MOJ blogger.  John doesn't need me to post his response.  And when I leave it up to John to post his own response here, he criticizes me for not posting it.  Gimme a break, John.