Senator Clinton, contraception, abortion, and radical agendas

The response of Senator Clinton and others to the prospect of defining abortion to include the Pill and IUD is interesting.  She alleges that this definition is driven by a “radical, ideological agenda,” but she never advances an argument (at least not in the article posted by Michael P.) that these “radicals” are wrong.  Instead, she seems to argue that we can’t possibly consider the Pill and IUD as abortifacients no matter what the facts because to do so would impose a cost on women.