Mirror of Justice

A blog dedicated to the development of Catholic legal theory.
Affiliated with the Program on Church, State & Society at Notre Dame Law School.

Thursday, July 17, 2008

More on the Pope, the environment, and human dignity

Following up on Michael's recent link to the Times article on the Pope's recent remarks on protecting the environment, here's a bit from the Pope's remarks at World Youth Day (HT:  Robert Imbelli at Commonweal):

My dear friends, God’s creation is one and it is good. The concerns for non-violence, sustainable development, justice and peace, and care for our environment are of vital importance for humanity. They cannot, however, be understood apart from a profound reflection upon the innate dignity of every human life from conception to natural death: a dignity conferred by God himself and thus inviolable. Our world has grown weary of greed, exploitation and division, of the tedium of false idols and piecemeal responses, and the pain of false promises. Our hearts and minds are yearning for a vision of life where love endures, where gifts are shared, where unity is built, where freedom finds meaning in truth, and where identity is found in respectful communion. This is the work of the Holy Spirit! This is the hope held out by the Gospel of Jesus Christ. It is to bear witness to this reality that you were created anew at Baptism and strengthened through the gifts of the Spirit at Confirmation. Let this be the message that you bring from Sydney to the world!  (italics added)

Benedict XVI on environmental degradation

New York Times

July 18, 2008

Pope Warns on Environment

By TIM JOHNSTON  

SYDNEY, Australia —  Pope Benedict XVI used his first major address at the Roman Catholic Church’s youth festival on Thursday to warn that the world was being scarred and its natural resources used up by humanity’s “insatiable consumption.”

In a broad criticism of consumer culture, before a crowd of more than 140,000 on a dock in Sydney harbor, Benedict reinforced the Vatican’s growing concern with protecting the environment, a theme he has addressed before.

“Perhaps reluctantly we come to acknowledge that there are also scars which mark the surface of our earth: erosion, deforestation, the squandering of the world’s mineral and ocean resources in order to fuel an insatiable consumption," he said.

[Click here to read the rest.]

Not to worry: "I will never leave you nor forsake you"

Sightings 7/17/08

Left Behind or Left in Cyberspace?

-- Noreen Herzfeld

As a teenager, when a friend first told me about the rapture, in which Christians will be miraculously transported to heaven while sinners remain on earth to suffer a variety of tribulations, I was quite sure that, sinner that I was, I was destined to be the one member of my family and friends who would surely be "left behind." My psychology teacher later assured me that considering oneself the "chief of sinners," as the apostle Paul did, was a normal response, since we each know our own peccadilloes far more intimately than we know those of others. Apparently, however, not everyone shares this proclivity. For forty dollars a year, those who are relatively assured of their own salvation can now leave a final e-mail to less fortunate loved ones who might be left behind during the rapture. A new web site, Youvebeenleftbehind.com, allows users to compose a final message that will be sent to up to sixty-two recipients, six days after the rapture occurs. These messages might be used to pass on information, such as bank account numbers and passwords, but the site stresses the opportunity to leave a letter begging those who remain to accept Christ, a last chance with one's loved ones to "snatch them from the flames."

This raises a host of questions, both practical and religious. Is it safe to store sensitive financial information on such a website (answer: no)? Would the web still function after the rapture? Why not play it safe, save the forty dollars, and simply leave a stack of letters on your desk? Youvebeenleftbehind.com is one of the latest attempts to market religion in cyberspace. Sites abound hawking a variety of religious books and wares. Beyond the crassly commercial, there are web sites for a wide variety of religious faiths and denominations where one can access religious texts, share experiences and prayer requests, initiate new spiritual friendships, or engage in ecumenical dialogue. As a resource for finding a quick answer to a religious question, the Internet is unbeatable. Web cams let one make a virtual pilgrimage to Mecca, the Wailing Wall, or Chartres Cathedral. Avatars in Second Life build virtual churches and synagogues and participate in religious rituals with one another. Each of these draws on the strength of the Internet as a medium that overcomes distance or physical limitations. The computer enlarges the neighborhood, giving opportunities to connect with or learn from a wide variety of people and traditions.

However, what computer technology gives to religion in terms of speed and broader access, it takes away through lack of physical presence. The sacramentality of the Christian faith, for one, calls us to move away from our keyboards and into the real world. In this world we cannot dismiss those with whom we disagree with the click of a mouse. We are asked to taste and feel and smell the world around us in its elemental richness. We learn what is, not what we wish were. Cyberspace is, in the end, an ambiguous place. We do not know if people in chat rooms are who they say they are. We do not know if an e-mail will really get forwarded on. As philosopher Albert Borgmann points out, "ambiguity is resolved through engagement with an existing reality, with the wilderness we are disagreed about, the urban life we are unsure of, or the people we do not understand." Computer applications may seem like a simpler alternative, but they are rarely as satisfying as the real thing.

So I think I'll save the forty dollars. A sealed envelope in my desk and power of attorney documents will cover my much more likely demise from natural causes. And as for worrying about myself or others being "left behind," Jesus' promise that "I will never leave you nor forsake you" is far more reassuring than any web site.

[Noreen Herzfeld is professor of Theology and Computer Science at St. John's University, Collegeville MN.]

Sightings comes from the Martin Marty Center at the University of Chicago Divinity School.

Can Catholics be "conservatives"?

At the Vox Nova blog, Jonathan has this interesting, very Burkean, post, "What is Conservativism?"  In response (in the comments box) "Morning's Minion" insists, citing Pope Benedict XVI, that Christians "cannot be true conservatives in the Burkean sense" because they live in history, and have a duty to build the Kingdom of God.  And the conversation continues.  Check it out.

The discussion is, I think, relevant to our "Catholic Legal Theory" project, if only because the legal enterprise and legal mindset is so often seen as -- and, in many ways, is -- "conservative".  So, what should this adjective mean for us -- how should we understand it -- who aspire to "do law" as Catholics?

Obama and the teacher-unions

Michael Perry is right:  Because the teacher-unions -- which is not, of course, to say "teachers" -- are misguided on so many questions, it is possible to disagree with them -- even to "stand up" to them -- without endorsing school-choice.  (That said, it is not possible, in my view, plausibly to present oneself as being committed to fairness and opportunity for low-income children if one categorically opposes even modest, pilot school-choice experiments.)  So, keeping in mind that the unions are likely less opposed to merit pay than to voucher experiments, it might well count as "stand[ing] up" to the teacher-unions to suggest, as Sen. Obama (correctly) did, that "districts could give teachers a salary increase, including if they serve as mentors; if they learn new skills, and if they 'consistently excel in the classroom.'"  (That this suggestion is controversial in some quarters tells us something about the priorities of those quarters, but that is another matter.)

Come by and see us

Norman, Oklahoma ranked 6th in CNN Money's best places to live.

Wednesday, July 16, 2008

Interesting Editorial in the Washington Post

The Washington Post criticized Obama's Iron Timetable.

Rick Garnett & Barack Obama

I suggested in an e-mail to Rick that his posting earlier today might be misleading:  Jonathan Alter (Newsweek) said that Barack Obama should stand up to the teachers' unions, not that he should support school vouchers.  (Standing up to the teachers' unions doesn't entail support for school vouchers.)

Well, it now appears that Sen Obama has stood up to the teachers' unions.  According to the (editorially-conservative) New York Sun (here):

Mr. Obama ... ha[s] aroused a mix of excitement from those who push for extensive change in public schools and skepticism from traditional union members who oppose the so-called reform policies, such as charter schools and plans to tie teacher pay to student test scores....

Mr. Obama ... raised concerns when he endorsed the idea of "merit pay" at a convention last year for the other national teachers union, the National Education Association.

In his address to the NEA this year, he acknowledged that the idea "wasn't necessarily the most popular part of my speech last year," but vowed to stand by it, eliciting some boos.

He also stood by the idea in his speech to the AFT convention yesterday, which he made via satellite from San Diego.

"When our educators succeed, I won't just talk about how great they are; I will reward them for it," Mr. Obama said. He listed several cases in which districts could give teachers a salary increase, including if they serve as mentors; if they learn new skills, and if they "consistently excel in the classroom."

Those at the AFT convention said that no boos followed the remarks, though some union members later said they were concerned by them.

"That was the one statement that raised our eyebrows," the president of the AFT's Los Angeles chapter, A.J. Duffy, said yesterday. "Our question is what does that mean, 'who consistently do well in classrooms,' and based upon whose guidelines? Is it a principal, a test score? We're going to continue to have dialogue with him."

Tuesday, July 15, 2008

Obama: No vouchers

I guess Sen. Obama's much-remarked "move to the center" has some limits.  After suggesting, in February, that he was not necessarily hostile to school choice, he has now made it clear, in a speech to the American Federation of Teachers, that he opposes school vouchers (including the Washington D.C. program, which enjoys bipartisan support, including from the District's mayor).  In my view (for what *that* is worth), he should have listened to Jonathan Alter (no right-winger), in this recent Newsweek piece, and taken on the teacher unions.  It's time to turn the page.

Alveda King to NAACP: Protect Life!

Bill McGurn's column, here, is worth reading.

"I remember when I was pregnant and considering a third abortion," she says. "I went to Daddy King [her grandfather and Martin Luther King's father]. He told me, 'that's a baby, not a blob of tissue.' Unfortunately, 14 million African-Americans are not here today because of legalized abortion. It's as if a plague swept through America's cities and towns and took one of every four of us."