Questions for Michael P.

First, do you agree with the way Rob Miller frames the SSM debate in this post?  If not, how would you frame it? 

Second, do you reject the notion that the biological reality (1+1=1 for heterosexual couples) signifies a deeper reality about the complementarity of the sexes, which makes hetersexual coupling different in kind from same-sex coupling?  If so, on what basis?

Third, and this goes back to Tom's question, which you don't really answer here. If SSM is analogous to interracial marriage on what grounds does the state extend its tolerance to religious groups who disagree with the new order of SSM while discriminating against religious groups who disagree with racial integration?