Skeel (Again) on Christian Legal Scholarship

Penn law prof David Skeel's earlier paper, The Unbearable Lightness of Christian Legal Scholarship, provoked some sharp critiques for claiming that "the scope of Christian legal scholarship is shockingly narrow." He has posted a new paper, The Paths of Christian Legal Scholarship.  Here's the abstract:

The history of twentieth century Christian legal scholarship- really, the absence of Christian legal scholarship in America's elite law schools- can be told as a tale of two emblematic clashes: the first an intriguing historical footnote, the second a brief, explosive war of words. In the first, a tort action in Nebraska circa 1890,William Jennings Bryan and Roscoe Pound served as opposing counsel; the second was a war of words in the 1940s between a group of neo-Thomist scholars and defenders of Oliver Wendell Holmes. Using these two incidents to frame as a starting point, this essay briefly chronicles the disappearance of Christian legal scholarship from the elite law reviews for much of the twentieth century. In the past few years, however, there have been signs of a possible renaissance. The second half of the essay focuses on the signs of renewal. To organize the discussion, I address three very basic questions: What?, Who?, and How? - What are the most promising directions for Christian legal scholarship? Who is a Christian legal scholar? And how can Christian legal scholarship best be facilitated?

Prof. Skeel does not back away from his earlier claims, but he does seem to soften them a bit.  And as one sign of the Christian legal scholarship "renaissance," I'm happy to note, he cites MoJ as "an important voice on faith-inflected issues."