Christian "Perspectives on an Evolving Creation"

Re. the discussion between Rick, Michael, and Eduardo on Sen. Brownback and evolution:  I agree that Brownback studiously dodged the question of macroevolution, the most important scientific point. He should be commended for articulating clearly, at the end of his op-ed, the philosophical and theological bedrocks on which Christians must stand in approaching evolution:

The fundamental question for me is how these theories affect our understanding of the human person.

The unique and special place of each and every person in creation is a fundamental truth that must be safeguarded. I am wary of any theory that seeks to undermine man’s essential dignity and unique and intended place in the cosmos.

But given the strength of evidence for macroevolution, it seems to me a quixotic effort to make these vital assertions of human dignity dependent on either denying or (like Brownback) sidestepping the validity of macroevolution.  Better to follow John Paul II's model: put intellectual resources into understanding evolution within theological frameworks such as God's providence and sustenance of creation.  Two scientists who have done so, as orthodox Christians, are geologist Keith Miller and astronomer Howard Van Til.  That's why I was interested to come across this 2003 book, edited by Miller and with contributions from both (and from philosophers and theologians), laying out the claim that "[t]he common prevailing view of conflict between evolutionary theory and Christian faith is a false caricature."

Tom