Mirror of Justice

A blog dedicated to the development of Catholic legal theory.
Affiliated with the Program on Church, State & Society at Notre Dame Law School.

Tuesday, April 24, 2007

Regret and the Constitution

Is potential regret constitutionally significant?  Reflecting on the majority opinion in Gonzales v. Carhart, Andy Koppelman wonders why it is relevant that women might come to regret their abortions:

[W]hat is the major premise of this argument? That constitutional liberties can be restricted if it sometimes happens that someone regrets exercising the liberty in a given way? It's hard to imagine any liberty that no one ever regrets. Some people who criticize actions of the government later wish that they had kept their mouths shut. Some criminal suspects regret that they didn't confess everything when the police first interrogated them. Some of the slaves freed by the Thirteenth Amendment were old and infirm, and some of them probably regretted leaving the plantation.

It is hard to imagine the boundaries of this principle as Kennedy has stated it. He cannot possibly mean it. One can only hope that, at some point, contemplating what he has written, he regrets it.

https://mirrorofjustice.blogs.com/mirrorofjustice/2007/04/regret_and_the_.html

Vischer, Rob | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515a9a69e200e5505ea4538834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Regret and the Constitution :