Friday, October 20, 2006
Steve,
You write, "As to Professor [Green]'s point that aliens from other
planets can be persons without having brains or nervous systems. Certainly the
latter is true (and angels can lack both), but they can not be human beings. And
the question remains, how do you prove that an embryo is a human being (or, if
you prefer, a human person) rather than a mere human
organism)?"
The aliens example
was only part one of my suggested response. Step one, a brain itself is
not required for personhood (even for materially-embodied beings).
That's where the aliens come in. Step two, the human embryo has the moral
equivalent of a brain. Why? Because the human
embryo contains the physical material that will build a
brain through the embryo's self-directed processes, and so the
embryo contains within itself the physical basis for behavior
characteristic of persons. I don't claim that I have given a proof, but I
do challenge those attracted to brain-&-nervous-system criteria of human
personhood to explain the moral difference between a brain--the brain possessed
by a reversibly-comatose person who will not wake up for a month, say--and
the epigenetic primordium of a brain possessed by the embryo. It doesn't
seem to me that there is any moral difference between the two, and I haven't
seen anyone explain what the moral
difference might be.
There are other
interesting things to say about "human beings," but I don't think the term is
essential to an argument for the moral status of the embryo. The short
form of my argument is simply that embryos are morally equivalent to
reversibly-comatose people, who are obviously persons. (If a being's
past exercise of capacities becomes an issue, I'll turn
to replicated reversibly-comatose people, who also seem to me
obviously to be persons.)
In general, I don't
think that anything more is required for thinking about the moral status of
the embryo than the same sort of distinction-drawing and case-to-case
reasoning that drives discussion about any other secular philosophical or
legal topic.
Chris
https://mirrorofjustice.blogs.com/mirrorofjustice/2006/10/response_from_p_1.html
| Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:$MTTrans>
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515a9a69e200e5505ea1148834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference
Response from Professor Green
: