Monday, July 3, 2006
Recommended Reading
Speaking of Christian legal theory, check this out:
Susan Pace Hamill, An Evaluation of Federal Tax Policy Based on Judeo-Christian Ethics, 25 Virginia Tax Review 671 (2006). You can download it from SSRN, where it was posted several months ago. Here's the abstract:
This article severely criticizes the
Bush Administration's tax policies under the moral principles of
Judeo-Christian ethics. I first document that Judeo-Christian ethics is
the most relevant moral analysis for tax policy because almost eighty
percent of Americans and well over ninety percent of the Congress,
including President Bush, claim to adhere to the Christian or Jewish
faiths. I also show that evaluating federal tax policy under
Judeo-Christian principles not only passes constitutional muster but is
also appropriate under the norms of a democracy. I then provide a
complete theological framework that can be applied to any tax policy
structure. Using sources that include leading Evangelical and other
Protestant scholars, Papal Encyclicals and Jewish scholars, I prove
that tax policy structures meeting the moral principles of
Judeo-Christian ethics must raise adequate revenues that not only cover
the needs of the minimum state but also ensure that all citizens have a
reasonable opportunity to reach their potential. Among other things,
reasonable opportunity requires adequate education, healthcare, job
training and housing. Using these theological sources, I also establish
that flat and consumption tax regimes which shift a large part of the
burden to the middle classes are immoral. Consequently, Judeo-Christian
based tax policy requires the tax burden to be allocated under a
moderately progressive regime. I discuss the difficulties of defining
that precisely and also conclude that confiscatory tax policy
approaching a socialistic framework is also immoral. I then apply this
Judeo-Christian ethical analysis to the first term Bush
Administration's tax cuts and find those policies to be morally
problematic. Using a wealth of sources, I then establish that the moral
values driving the Bush Administration's tax policy decisions reflect
objectivist ethics, a form of atheism that exalts individual property
rights over all other moral considerations. Given the overwhelming
adherence to Christianity and Judaism, I conclude that President Bush,
many members of Congress and many Americans are not meeting the moral
obligations of their faiths, and, I argue that tax policy must start
reflecting genuine Judeo-Christian values if the country is to survive
in the long run.
_______________
mp
https://mirrorofjustice.blogs.com/mirrorofjustice/2006/07/recommended_rea.html