Reply to Michael

Michael's latest post deserves more, but . . . it is quite clear (to me, anyway) that even a nominee with Michael's reasonable and well argued views on Roe, Casey, and Atkins would be opposed by the Senate Democrats -- and by Senator Casey.

I agree, by the way, that everyone should read and engage Michael's important Thayerian argument about the death penalty (and other controversial matters) and the Constitution.  I'll leave it to MOJ readers, though, to decide whether or not the argument is persuasive.